HC Quashes GST Order Passed Without Proper Service of Show Cause Notice:

HC Quashes GST Order Passed Without Proper Service of Show Cause Notice

Show cause notice uploaded only under “Additional Notices” tab held insufficient; matter remanded for fresh adjudication with hearing

GST Order Quashed for Improper Service of Show Cause Notice: Delhi HC

authorMeetu KumaridateJan 26, 2026
Last update on Jan 26, 2026
HC Quashes GST Order Passed Without Proper Service of Show Cause Notice The petitioner, a sole proprietor carrying on retail business under the name N.S. Super Mart, challenged a GST show cause notice dated 15.12.2023 and the consequent order-in-original dated 03.04.2024, by which a tax demand of Rs. 10.91 lakh was raised. The demand was based on alleged excess availment of Input Tax Credit due to GSTR-2A/3B mismatch, non-reversal of ITC on exempt supplies, and ITC claimed from suppliers whose registrations were cancelled.
NFRA Cracks Down on Audit File Lapses: 60-Day Completion Rule, 7-Day Submission Deadline, Many More
The petitioner said that the show cause notice and later reminders were never served in any meaningful manner and were merely uploaded on the GST portal under the “Additional Notices and Orders” tab, which remained unnoticed. Thus, no reply was filed, and the proceedings culminated in an ex parte order. Main Issue: Whether GST adjudication proceedings are sustainable when the show cause notice is uploaded only under the “Additional Notices” tab on the GST portal, thereby denying the assessee an effective opportunity of hearing. HC's Judgment: The Hon'ble High Court held that the issue was squarely covered by its earlier judgment in Neelgiri Machinery, as followed in Etemad Cargo. The Court accepted the petitioner’s contention that uploading notices only under the “Additional Notices” tab does not constitute valid or effective service, particularly when it results in the assessee being unaware of the proceedings.
NFRA Cracks Down on Audit File Lapses: 60-Day Completion Rule, 7-Day Submission Deadline, Many More
The Court found that the petitioner had been denied a reasonable opportunity to respond, and thereafter, the principles of natural justice were violated. The order-in-original was therefore quashed. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority with liberty to the petitioner to file a reply within four weeks. The authority was directed to grant a personal hearing and pass a reasoned order in accordance with the law within three months. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…