ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Auditing Firm Where Wife Held Majority Stake

Committee finds violation of independence norms after CA audited partnership firm in which his wife held up to 73% profit share.

ICAI Reprimands CA for Auditing Firm Where Wife Held 73% Profit Share

Meetu Kumari | Mar 11, 2026 |

ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Auditing Firm Where Wife Held Majority Stake

ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Auditing Firm Where Wife Held Majority Stake

A complaint was filed by CA B.S. Roopkumar against CA Besur Hallappa Renukappa before the Disciplinary Directorate of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India regarding his professional conduct in relation to the partnership firm M/s Saishiva Hotels Inc., Bengaluru.

After reviewing the complaint, the Director (Discipline) found that the key issue requiring examination was that the respondent had audited the firm’s financial statements even though his wife was a partner in the firm with a substantial profit share ranging from 51% to 73% during FY 2013–14 and FY 2014-15. Despite being aware of this relationship, and even disclosing it in the tax audit report, the respondent continued with the audit engagement.

Issue Raised: Whether a chartered accountant commits professional misconduct by auditing the financial statements of an entity in which his spouse has a substantial financial interest.

Tribunal Ruling: The Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India held the respondent guilty of professional misconduct under Item (4) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The Committee observed that auditor independence is fundamental, and the ICAI Code of Ethics prohibits an auditor from expressing an opinion on financial statements where he or his relative has a substantial interest.

Since the respondent’s wife was a partner with a significant profit share, the situation created a clear conflict affecting independence. However, considering that the respondent admitted the lapse, had disclosed the relationship in the audit report, and the entity involved was a closely held firm with no public interest element, the Committee imposed a minimal penalty and reprimanded the respondent.

To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ICAI Reprimands CA And Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Fine For Issuing Review Report Without Peer Review Certificate ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Auditing Firm Where Wife Held Majority Stake ICAI Reprimands CA for Issuing Incorrect Property Certificate Despite Delhi High Court Restriction ICAI Disciplinary Committee Clears CA in Forgery and UDIN Non-Compliance Case ITAT Holds Goodwill Amortization from Slump Sale as Non-Operating for TP Margin View All Posts