ICAI Reprimands CA And Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Fine For Issuing Review Report Without Peer Review Certificate:

ICAI Reprimands CA And Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Fine For Issuing Review Report Without Peer Review Certificate

Disciplinary Committee holds CA guilty of professional misconduct for signing review report despite not holding a valid Peer Review Certificate.

Limited Review Report Without Peer Review Certificate Leads to ICAI Penalty

authorMeetu KumaridateMar 11, 2026
Last update on Mar 11, 2026
ICAI Reprimands CA And Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Fine For Issuing Review Report Without Peer Review Certificate The Respondent, CA. Sumit Gupta, had issued a Limited Review Report dated 13 November 2018 on the half-yearly financial results of Fourth Dimension Solutions Ltd. for the period ended 30 September 2018. At the time of signing the report, the Respondent’s firm had applied for peer review on 7 September 2018 but the Peer Review Certificate was issued only on 5 March 2019. Thus, on the date of signing the report, the Respondent did not hold a valid Peer Review Certificate.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
Regulation 33(1)(d) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 requires that limited review or audit reports submitted to stock exchanges must be issued only by auditors holding a valid Peer Review Certificate from ICAI. Despite this requirement, the Respondent accepted the assignment and signed the review report without possessing such certificate. Main Issue: Whether issuing a limited review report for a listed company without holding a valid Peer Review Certificate, as required under Regulation 33(1)(d) of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, amounts to professional misconduct and failure to exercise due diligence under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Committee Decides: The Disciplinary Committee observed that the Respondent issued the limited review report on 13 November 2018 without holding a valid Peer Review Certificate, which was a mandatory requirement under SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Being a professional, he was expected to be aware of the applicable regulatory provisions before accepting such assignment.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The Committee held that issuing the report without the required certification reflected lack of due diligence and conduct unbecoming of a Chartered Accountant. Therefore, the Respondent was held guilty of professional and other misconduct under Clause (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule and Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The Committee reprimanded the Respondent, removed his name from the Register of Members for one month, and imposed a fine of Rs. 1,00,000, payable within 60 days. Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2220
Up Next

Loading suggestions…