ICAI Suspends CA for Three Months Over Improper Adjustment of Director’s Loan:

ICAI Suspends CA for Three Months Over Improper Adjustment of Director’s Loan

Failure to obtain independent audit evidence and report material misstatement leads to reprimand, suspension and Rs. 1 lakh fine

ICAI Suspends CA for 3 Months Over Faulty Loan Adjustment in Audit

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 23, 2026
Last update on Feb 23, 2026
ICAI Suspends CA for Three Months Over Improper Adjustment of Director’s Loan A complaint was filed by Shri Hukum Singh, minority shareholder and former director of M/s Adaab Hotels Ltd., against CA Sanjay Gupta, statutory auditor for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19. In the balance sheet as on 31.03.2018, an unsecured loan of Rs. 50,05,438.16 was shown as payable to the complainant. In the later year, the liability was shown as NIL, while Rs. 19,39,431.03 was reflected as recoverable from him under long-term loans and advances to related parties. The complainant alleged that no repayment was made and that the adjustment lacked confirmations or supporting evidence. The Respondent contended that adjustments were based on board resolutions, management representations, and alleged misappropriation by the Complainant, and that audit procedures were duly followed.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
Main Issue: Whether the auditor failed to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence and exercise professional skepticism in certifying financial statements that reversed a loan payable into a recoverable balance from a related party, amounting to misconduct under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Committee's Decision: The Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India held the Respondent guilty on the first charge. It found that he failed to produce audit working papers, balance confirmations, reconciliations or documented legal opinions justifying the conversion of Rs. 50,05,438.16 payable into Rs. 19,39,431.03 recoverable. Reliance solely on management representations, particularly amid shareholder disputes, was held insufficient. Non-compliance with SA 505 and failure to exercise professional skepticism under SA 240 were noted.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The Committee accepted reliance on a Board Resolution and related records and found no negligence. Accordingly, the Respondent was found guilty on the first charge and not guilty on the second. Due the gravity of professional misconduct, the Committee ordered reprimand, removal of his name from the Register of Members for three months, and a fine of Rs. 1,00,000 payable within 60 days. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…