ICSI Notification of the sections of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017

ICSI Notification of the sections of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 MCA/2019 Shri Injeti Srinivas Secretary Ministry of Corporate Affai

ICSI Notification of the sections of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017
MCA/2019
Shri Injeti Srinivas
Secretary
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Government of India
5th Floor, Shastri Bhawan
Dr. Rajendra Prasad
New Delhi - 110001
Subject : Notification of sections of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 - Reg.
Sir ,
The Companies Act , 2013 has undergone various amendments over the past five years since its being brought into force. Of these, the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 can very well be considered a game changer for its holistic approach and for providing comfort to the stakeholders as regards compliance while stressing upon and strengthening various aspects of the law .
Sir , as regards the same, we wish to bring to your kind notice the status of notification of amendment made in Section 92 (Annual Return) and Section 134 (F'inancial Statement, Board's Report. etc.) which is as wider :
It may be noted that in Section 134(3)(a) pertaining to inclusion of the web address in lieu of extract of Annual Return in the Board's Report has been notified on and made effective from 31st July, 2018, the corresponding section for the reference made therein, i.e., Section 92(3) stating the placing Annual Return on the website is yet to be notified. Therefore, in view of non-notification of amendment to Section 92(3), the provision of making extract of annual return a part of Board 's Report remains in force. The law while intended at providing relief to the corporates and the professionals alike has been raising practical difficulties on account of not being notified.
Furthermore, clarification is solicited with respect to the core intent of Section 92(3), in relation to "placing of copy of the annual return". Herein, it is unclear as to whether the Annual Return to be placed is for the previous year or current year. The reason for the same can be attributed to the fact that in case of Annual Return for the current year (i.e., for the year ended March 31, 2019) the date of AGM may not have been finalized. In such a situation, annual return is not complete in all respects and uploading the current year's annual return may not serve the intended purpose.
Click Here to Buy CA Final Pendrive Classes at Discounted Rate
You May Also Like : CBDTs Central Action Plan encouraging CIT(A) to pass revenue favoring orders set aside by HC
| Section | Pre-Amendment | Post Amendment | Date of notification |
| 92(3) | An extract of the annual return in such form as may be prescribed shall form part of the Board's report | Every company shall place a copy of the annual return on the website of the company, if any, and the web-link of such annual return shall be disclosed in the Board's report. | Yet to be notified |
| 134(3)(a) | There shall be attached to statements laid before a company in general meeting, a report by its Board of Directors, which shall include the extract of the annual return as provided under sub-section (3) of section 92 | There shall be attached to statements laid before a company in general meeting, a report by its Board of Directors, which shall include the web address, if any, where annual return referred to in sub-section (3) of section 92 has been placed. | 3l't July, 2018 |
About Author

CA Deepak Gupta
Co Founder
CA Deepak Gupta,is Co-founder of Studycafe. He is Microsoft Office Specialist and Corporate Trainer of AI Tools, Microsoft Excel.
He is Finance Influencer having more than 250K followers on Social Media. CA Deepak Gupta, is Having more than 14 plus years of experience, and he has Worked with best brands Like, Hero, Wipro, Ericsson before Starting Studycafe. He has Trained more than 20000 Persons in Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint, Power BI, Google Sheet, Google Forms and Other Tools.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
3423My Recent Articles
- UltraTech Cement slapped with Rs. 808.78 Cr Income Tax Demand
- GST: High Court upheld constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c), asks government to address ITC issues of genuine purchasers
- Old vs New Tax Regime for Tax Year 2026-27
- High court criticizes Income Tax Department for not releasing ITR Utilities despite 11 years of directions
- Fino Payments Bank CEO Rishi Gupta Gets Bail in GST Case, Bank Clarifies No Direct Link
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.







