ITAT Deletes Addition Under Section 69A After Accepting Cash Received on Relinquishment of Property Rights:

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition made under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that cash deposits could not be treated as unexplained where the assessee establishes that the money is for relinquishing his share in an inherited house property
ITAT Grants Relief by Deleting Section 69A Addition

ITAT Deletes Addition Under Section 69A After Accepting Cash Received on Relinquishment of Property Rights
ITAT Allahabad held that the addition made under Section 69A was unsustainable and accordingly allowed the appeal of the assessee.
The assessee filed his return of income, declaring a total income of Rs 5.47 lakh. The case was selected for limited scrutiny and notices were issued seeking explanation regarding cash deposits made but during the assessment proceedings, the AO noticed cash deposits aggregating to Rs 29.69 lakh. Finding the explanation furnished by the assessee unsatisfactory, the AO treated the entire amount as unexplained money under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal but sustained the addition to the extent of Rs 7.50 lakh.
The assessee before Tribunal argued that the amount represented cash consideration received from his real brother towards relinquishment of his share in an inherited residential property. In support of the claim, the assessee produced an unregistered deed dated 17 December 2016 and furnished particulars of the cash receipts.
It was observed that the assessee had furnished details regarding the cash component received from his brother and that these particulars sufficiently established the source of the cash deposits. It held that neither the AO nor the CIT(A) had properly appreciated these material aspects.
Allowing the appeal, the ITAT Ahmedabad held that where an assessee demonstrates that cash deposits originated from consideration received for relinquishing rights in inherited property, such deposits cannot be treated as unexplained money merely because the underlying document is unregistered. Consequently, the addition of Rs 7.50 lakh made under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted.
About Author

Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
222My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Disallowance of Marketing Expenses After Assessee Corroborates Ledger Entries with Debit NotesPremium
- ITAT Rules Executive Search Fee Not Taxable as FTS Under India-Netherlands DTAAPremium
- ITAT Holds Reimbursement of Common Expenses Without Profit Not Liable for TDSPremium
- ITAT Rules That Reassessment Proceedings Invalid Without Mandatory Notice under Section 143(2)Premium
- ITAT Rules that Section 153C Cannot Be Invoked Where the Date of Search for 'Other Person' Falls After 1 April 2021Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








