ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.67 Crore Section 68 Addition Against Cooperative Credit Society

Member deposits and cash collections cannot be treated as unexplained credits in mutual benefit society.

ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.67 Crore Addition on Member Deposits of Cooperative Society

Meetu Kumari | Feb 16, 2026 |

ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.67 Crore Section 68 Addition Against Cooperative Credit Society

ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.67 Crore Section 68 Addition Against Cooperative Credit Society

Sree Narayana Guru Cooperative and Credit Society Ltd, a thrift and credit cooperative society, accepts deposits from its members and provides loans to them. For AY 2012-13, the assessment was reopened under Section 147 based on AIR information showing cash deposits of Rs. 1.51 crore in its bank account. During reassessment, the Assessing Officer examined term deposit liabilities of Rs. 3.16 crore and cash deposits, for which the assessee furnished member-wise details, books of account, deposit registers and confirmations explaining that the amounts represented deposits collected from members under various schemes.

The AO, however, held that the identity and creditworthiness of depositors were not proved and treated Rs. 3.16 crore as unexplained term deposits and Rs. 1.51 crore as unexplained cash credits under Section 68, making a total addition of Rs. 4.67 crore. The CIT(A) affirmed the additions.

Issue Before Tribunal: Whether deposits received from members of a cooperative credit society and corresponding bank deposits can be treated as unexplained credits under Section 68.

ITAT’s Ruling: The ITAT deleted the additions, holding that the AO failed to appreciate the nature of a mutual cooperative society. It noted that the opening deposit balance was Rs. 2.24 crore and that fresh deposits during the year were Rs. 94.78 lakh; it was unjustified to treat the entire closing balance as unexplained. The Tribunal observed that detailed member-wise records, books of account and cash books were produced, and many deposits were small amounts, making insistence on income-tax returns or separate confirmations from each depositor unreasonable.

The cash deposits were found to have been sourced from normal member collections during regular business.  The Tribunal deleted the additions and applied the same reasoning to AY 2017-18.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
GST: AAAR Denies ITC on Land Lease for Air Separation Plant Setup SC Restores Eviction; Partnership Reconstitution Held Sham Sub-Letting Device HC Declines to De-Freeze Account Amid Fraud Allegations GST E-waybill: High Court slams GST Department for detaining Goods for 4 Months Without Seizure Order Distribution of ITC through ISD is not mandatory before April 2025 AmendmentView All Posts