ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.67 Crore Section 68 Addition Against Cooperative Credit Society:

ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.67 Crore Section 68 Addition Against Cooperative Credit Society

Member deposits and cash collections cannot be treated as unexplained credits in mutual benefit society.

ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.67 Crore Addition on Member Deposits of Cooperative Society

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 16, 2026
Last update on Feb 16, 2026
ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.67 Crore Section 68 Addition Against Cooperative Credit Society Sree Narayana Guru Cooperative and Credit Society Ltd, a thrift and credit cooperative society, accepts deposits from its members and provides loans to them. For AY 2012-13, the assessment was reopened under Section 147 based on AIR information showing cash deposits of Rs. 1.51 crore in its bank account. During reassessment, the Assessing Officer examined term deposit liabilities of Rs. 3.16 crore and cash deposits, for which the assessee furnished member-wise details, books of account, deposit registers and confirmations explaining that the amounts represented deposits collected from members under various schemes.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The AO, however, held that the identity and creditworthiness of depositors were not proved and treated Rs. 3.16 crore as unexplained term deposits and Rs. 1.51 crore as unexplained cash credits under Section 68, making a total addition of Rs. 4.67 crore. The CIT(A) affirmed the additions. Issue Before Tribunal: Whether deposits received from members of a cooperative credit society and corresponding bank deposits can be treated as unexplained credits under Section 68.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
ITAT's Ruling: The ITAT deleted the additions, holding that the AO failed to appreciate the nature of a mutual cooperative society. It noted that the opening deposit balance was Rs. 2.24 crore and that fresh deposits during the year were Rs. 94.78 lakh; it was unjustified to treat the entire closing balance as unexplained. The Tribunal observed that detailed member-wise records, books of account and cash books were produced, and many deposits were small amounts, making insistence on income-tax returns or separate confirmations from each depositor unreasonable. The cash deposits were found to have been sourced from normal member collections during regular business.  The Tribunal deleted the additions and applied the same reasoning to AY 2017-18. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…