ITAT Remands TDS Demand; Allows DTAA Relief Verification Opportunity:

The ITAT remands the TDS demand for the dividend paid to the Mauritius entity, allowing the assessee to submit TRC and Form 10F to claim the DTAA benefit.
DTAA Benefit Cannot Be Denied Without Proper Document Verification

ITAT Remands TDS Demand; Allows DTAA Relief Verification Opportunity
The assessee, Shri Ram Krupa Medicare Private Limited, had paid a dividend of Rs 21.15 lakh to its Mauritius-based shareholder, Basswood Holdings Limited, during FY 2020-21 and deducted TDS at 5% under Section 195 by applying the India–Mauritius DTAA. The TDS return in Form 27Q was initially processed but later rectified under Section 154, raising a demand for short deduction by applying a 20% rate under the Act.
The assessee contended that it had correctly applied the beneficial DTAA rate and had also obtained the Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) and Form 10F. However, the lower authorities rejected the claim on the grounds that such documents were not furnished for the relevant period. Before the Tribunal, the assessee produced these documents, though the TRC pertained to a later period and not the relevant quarter in which the dividend was paid.
Issue Raised: Whether TDS on a dividend paid to a Mauritius resident can be taxed at a higher domestic rate when a DTAA benefit is claimed, but supporting documents like TRC and Form 10F are not furnished for the relevant period.
Tribunal Held: The Tribunal observed that there was no dispute regarding the eligibility of the Mauritius-based shareholder to claim benefits under the India-Mauritius DTAA, under which dividend income is taxable at 5%. However, it noted that the Tax Residency Certificate placed on record did not pertain to the relevant period of payment.
Considering this factual gap, the Tribunal held that the matter required fresh verification. It set aside the issue to the file of the TDS Assessing Officer, granting the assessee another opportunity to furnish the correct TRC and Form 10F for the relevant period. The AO was directed to re-adjudicate the issue in accordance with the law after examining the documents.
To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








