ITAT: Reopening Based on Third-Party Info Without Rejecting Books Is Illegal:

ITAT: Reopening Based on Third-Party Info Without Rejecting Books Is Illegal

ITAT holds reassessment invalid as Section 148 was wrongly invoked instead of Section 153C in search-based case

ITAT rules that reassessment under Section 148 is invalid; holds Section 153C should have been invoked instead.

authorMeetu KumaridateJul 4, 2025
Last update on Jul 4, 2025
 ITAT: Reopening Based on Third-Party Info Without Rejecting Books Is Illegal

The assessee filed its return under Section 139(1) for A.Y. 2013-14 on 28.09.2013, assessed at Rs. 7.61 crore on 15.03.2016. Later, after statements during a proprietor's search for bogus billing and entries, the Assessing Officer initiated reassessment under Section 147, issuing notices on 14.01.2021, and final assessment on 22.03.2022 increased income to Rs. 35.51 crore. Similar reassessments were made for 2014-15 and 2015-16.

The assessee challenged the reopening, arguing the search was on a third party and proceedings should have been under Section 153C, and that its books and sales were accepted, making additions under Sections 68 or 69A unsustainable. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal, reducing additions to 2%. Both Revenue and Assessee filed cross-appeals before the ITAT against the CIT(A)’s order.

When Primary Onus is Discharged by submitting documents Dept to Prove that Money Belongs to Assessee: ITAT

Issue Raised: Whether reassessment under Section 147, based on a third-party search, was valid or should have been done under Section 153C, especially when the assessee’s books and sales were accepted.

Property Bought with Family Funds, Not Unexplained Investment: ITAT

Tribunal Held: The ITAT held that reopening the assessment under Section 147 based solely on information from a search conducted on a third party was legally unsustainable. It ruled that such proceedings, if any, should have been initiated under Section 153C. The Tribunal further observed that the assessee's books of account, stock records, and declared sales were accepted by the Department, and no incriminating material was found during any search on the assessee itself.

Therefore, the additions made under Sections 68 and 69A were unjustified. The ITAT set aside the additions and allowed the assessee’s appeals while dismissing the Revenue’s appeals. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…