ITAT: Reopening Based on Third-Party Info Without Rejecting Books Is Illegal

ITAT holds reassessment invalid as Section 148 was wrongly invoked instead of Section 153C in search-based case

ITAT rules that reassessment under Section 148 is invalid; holds Section 153C should have been invoked instead.

Meetu Kumari | Jul 4, 2025 |

ITAT: Reopening Based on Third-Party Info Without Rejecting Books Is Illegal

 ITAT: Reopening Based on Third-Party Info Without Rejecting Books Is Illegal

The assessee filed its return under Section 139(1) for A.Y. 2013-14 on 28.09.2013, assessed at Rs. 7.61 crore on 15.03.2016. Later, after statements during a proprietor’s search for bogus billing and entries, the Assessing Officer initiated reassessment under Section 147, issuing notices on 14.01.2021, and final assessment on 22.03.2022 increased income to Rs. 35.51 crore. Similar reassessments were made for 2014-15 and 2015-16.

The assessee challenged the reopening, arguing the search was on a third party and proceedings should have been under Section 153C, and that its books and sales were accepted, making additions under Sections 68 or 69A unsustainable. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal, reducing additions to 2%. Both Revenue and Assessee filed cross-appeals before the ITAT against the CIT(A)’s order.

Issue Raised: Whether reassessment under Section 147, based on a third-party search, was valid or should have been done under Section 153C, especially when the assessee’s books and sales were accepted.

Tribunal Held: The ITAT held that reopening the assessment under Section 147 based solely on information from a search conducted on a third party was legally unsustainable. It ruled that such proceedings, if any, should have been initiated under Section 153C. The Tribunal further observed that the assessee’s books of account, stock records, and declared sales were accepted by the Department, and no incriminating material was found during any search on the assessee itself.

Therefore, the additions made under Sections 68 and 69A were unjustified. The ITAT set aside the additions and allowed the assessee’s appeals while dismissing the Revenue’s appeals.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ITAT Ahmedabad deletes major TP additions, limits R&D deduction to DSIR approval PCIT’s Section 263 revision quashed where AO had made due enquiries on alleged bogus purchases Delhi HC awards 6% interest on VAT refund delayed by over 15 years Delhi HC sets aside GST order passed without proper service of show cause notice CBI Court Sentences Three to 3 Years’ Jail in Rs. 1.18 Crore Excise Duty Rebate FraudView All Posts