ITAT Rules Sale of Carbon Credits as Non-Taxable Capital Receipt; Deletes Major Additions:

Tribunal Upholds 0.25% Corporate Guarantee Fee as Arm’s Length and Allows Employee Welfare School Donation as Business Expenditure
ITAT Grants Major Relief; Carbon Credits Held Capital Receipt

ITAT Rules Sale of Carbon Credits as Non-Taxable Capital Receipt; Deletes Major Additions
SRF Limited challenged assessment orders for AYs 2011–12 and 2013-14, raising a host of issues ranging from transfer pricing adjustments on corporate guarantees given to overseas subsidiaries, disallowance under Section 14A, and denial of deduction for donations made to a school run for employees’ children.
The company also disputed the taxability of receipts from the sale of Carbon Credits (CERs) and the interest subsidy received under the Technology Upgradation Fund (TUF) Scheme, maintaining that both were capital in nature. In addition, SRF sought rectification of a computational mistake in its Section 10A deduction and claimed a Section 80-IA deduction that had been inadvertently omitted from the original returns.
Main Issue: Whether CER sale proceeds and TUF interest subsidy are capital receipts; whether a corporate guarantee fee of 0.25% satisfies the arm’s length standard; and whether appellate authorities can allow correction of computational errors or consider deduction claims missed in the return.
ITAT's Ruling: The Delhi ITAT granted substantial relief to SRF by following settled decisions in the company’s own case. It held that income from sale of Carbon Credits is a capital receipt and cannot be taxed either under the normal provisions or while computing MAT under Section 115JB. The Assessing Officer was directed to exclude these receipts altogether.
The Tribunal upheld the 0.25% corporate guarantee fee as arm’s length, noting that the guarantees were backed by counter-guarantees from subsidiaries and bank quotations.
The Tribunal further held that genuine computational mistakes in Section 10A deduction cannot defeat a lawful claim and allowed the correction. Issues relating to the Section 80-IA deduction and verification of TUF subsidy for MAT purposes were sent back to the Assessing Officer for factual examination.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2158My Recent Articles
- ITAT Quashes Consequential Assessment After Section 263 Revision Order FailsPremium
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








