ITAT Says Rule 46A Cannot Be Invoked for Evidence Already Before AO:
The ITAT Delhi Held That Mere Re-filing of Documents Before CIT(A) Does Not Amount to Additional Evidence Under Rule 46A
ITAT Upholds Addition on Bogus Share Application Money
Saima
Jul 31, 2026Premium
ITAT Says Rule 46A Cannot Be Invoked for Evidence Already Before AO
The ITAT Delhi Held That Mere Re-filing of Documents Before CIT(A) Does Not Amount to Additional Evidence Under Rule 46A
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
240My Recent Articles
- ITAT Says No Addition if Deposits Are Recorded in Books Despite PAN ConfusionPremium
- ITAT Quashes Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond ‘Surviving Time’ Under TOLA and Section 148Premium
- ITAT Quashes Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond Surviving Limitation Period Prescribed Under TOLAPremium
- ITAT Holds Charitable Trust Cannot Be Assessed as Association of PersonsPremium
- ITAT Restricts Section 69A Addition to Rs 3 Lakh Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts