Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann’s OSD Rajbir Singh Ghuman Moves High Court Against CBI Probe, Challenges Search of Sangrur Residence Without Prior Approval:

Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann’s OSD Rajbir Singh Ghuman Moves High Court Against CBI Probe, Challenges Search of Sangrur Residence Without Prior Approval

Punjab CM’s OSD Rajbir Singh Ghuman challenges the CBI probe and Sangrur raid over alleged lack of prior approval.

Ghuman Challenges CBI Probe in High Court

authorVanshika vermadateOct 9, 2026
Last update on Oct 9, 2026

Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann’s OSD, Rajbir Singh Ghuman, has approached the Punjab and Haryana High Court, challenging the CBI investigation and search at his residence in Sangrur. He has alleged that the agency carried out the search without obtaining the mandatory prior approval required under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

IIFL Subsidiaries Receive Income Tax demand worth Rs 56 Crore; Company Confident of Legal Stand

In his petition filed on Thursday, Ghuman claimed that the CBI registered an FIR at around 11.50 pm on October 5 and searched his family home in Gharachon village, Sangrur, within the next 24 hours. He argued that the agency did not obtain the required government approval before starting the investigation.

According to the petition, the search began at around 5.50 pm on October 6 and continued until 4 am on October 7. Ghuman claimed that neither he nor his family members were present at the house during the search. He also questioned the search and seizure process, alleging that only one independent witness was present.

Ghuman’s petition states that Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act requires prior government approval before investigating a public servant over decisions or recommendations made as part of official duties. The law provides an exception for cases involving an on-the-spot arrest during a trap operation. Ghuman has argued that this exception does not apply to his case.

He has also challenged the CBI’s action on the ground that the FIR was registered following an October 5 order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Citing a 2020 Supreme Court judgment in the Yashwant Sinha vs CBI case, he argued that even when a court directs the registration of an FIR, the agency must follow the legal requirement of obtaining prior approval under Section 17A.

Ghuman has asked the High Court to quash the investigation against him until the required approval is obtained. Alternatively, he has sought directions preventing the CBI from taking further action against him without securing approval under the provision.

IIFL Subsidiaries Receive Income Tax demand worth Rs 56 Crore; Company Confident of Legal Stand

The petition has brought the legality of the CBI’s search and its investigation under judicial scrutiny. The High Court’s decision could determine whether the agency can continue its proceedings against Ghuman without first obtaining the approval required by law.

About Author

LinkedIn

Vanshika verma

Content Writer

Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2055
Up Next

Loading suggestions…