ITAT Slams Revenue: Appeal Dismissed After AO’s Unexplained Truck Business Income Addition Found Baseless:

ITAT Delhi did not find any relevant reason to interfere with the findings of CIT(A) and hence rejected the appeal filed by the DCIT/Revenue/Income Tax Department.
ITAT Delhi Endores Claims Submitted by Assessee

ITAT Slams Revenue: Appeal Dismissed After AO’s Unexplained Truck Business Income Addition Found Baseless
The present appeal has been filed by the DCIT, Circle 61(1), Delhi (Appellant), against a taxpayer named Sukhbir Singh Chabra (Respondent) in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench “G”, New Delhi, before Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad (Judicial Member) and Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra (Accountant Member). The case is related to the assessment year 2016-17, was heard in the court on August 21, 2025, and the final decision was announced on November 04, 2025.
This appeal has been filed by the Income Tax Department challenging an order dated February 28, 2020, issued by the CIT(A), for the assessment year 2016-17. The order deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained income of the assessee from the truck-running business.
The authorised representative of the department claimed that in violation of Rule 46A, the assessee furnished additional evidence before CIT(A), which led it to mistakenly allow the appeal; however, the AO was not given any chance to cross-check the evidence submitted by the assessee. On this, the authorised representative of the assessee claimed that they did not submit additional evidence before CIT(A); whatever evidence was furnished earlier before the AO during the assessment was the same as what was served before CIT(A).
When the case was taken before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi. The tribunal ruled that since the Income Tax Department (Revenue) could not flag which documents were additionally submitted as evidence before CIT(A), the court rejected the claim of revenue.
The tribunal did not find any relevant reason to interfere with the findings of CIT(A) and hence rejected the appeal filed by the DCIT/Revenue/Income Tax Department.
Refer to the official judgement for complete information
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2702My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condoned Delay After Noting Indeed Technical Glitch on E-filing Portal and Restores Section 12A and 80G ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








