ITAT Relief: Demonetization Cash Treated as Sales, Not Unexplained Income

ITAT rules that Section 69A can't be invoked where cash deposits are duly recorded in audited books.

ITAT Overturns 58.5L Cash Deposit Addition Made During Demonetization

Meetu Kumari | Jun 22, 2025 |

ITAT Relief: Demonetization Cash Treated as Sales, Not Unexplained Income

ITAT Relief: Demonetization Cash Treated as Sales, Not Unexplained Income

In a significant relief for taxpayers affected by demonetization scrutiny, the ITAT deleted an addition of Rs. 58.5 lakhs made under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee, a partnership firm in the jewellery trade, deposited money into its bank account in November 2016 and claimed it was for actual October sales that were documented in audited books and reported on VAT returns. During the assessment, it turned in their ledgers, cash books, stock registers, VAT orders, and invoices. However, the Assessing Officer questioned the sales and noted that the amount was not deposited prior to demonetization, treating the deposit as unexplained. The aggrieved assessee went into appeal, and the Ld. CIT(A) sustained the addition made u/s 69A of the Act.

Main Issue: Can cash deposits already recorded in audited books and made during the demonetization period be treated as unexplained money under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act?

ITAT Held: The Tribunal accepted the assessee’s position, emphasising that Section 69A applies only when the asset in question is not recorded in the books of account. The Tribunal held that the addition were unsustainable because the cash deposits were openly accounted for and there were no flaws in the audit, stock records, or reported sales. Invoking Section 69A was deemed unnecessary because the deposited amount was fully accounted for, backed by third-party verification (VAT), and the AO had approved the declared profit margins.

The ITAT held that the audited nature of the books and verifiable sales rendered the invocation of Section 69A improper, referring to precedents from various Tribunals and the High Court. Accordingly, the Rs. 58.5 lakh addition was deleted, and the legal ground in the assessee’s favour was allowed.

To Read Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
Income Tax: ITAT Says Leasehold Improvements Eligible for Depreciation Regional Rural Bank Wins: ITAT Allows 80P Deduction, Declines to Uphold Reassessment Income Tax: ITAT Crushes Section 153C Reassessments Based on Dead Man’s Diary ITAT Slashes Baseless 10% Expense Disallowance to 4% Demonetization Cash Deposits from Prior Withdrawals Can’t Be Taxed Just for Time Gap: ITATView All Posts