ITC on RCC Foundation for Lyophilized Injectables Plant Not Ruled Upon as Activity Already Completed: Rajasthan AAR:

Advance ruling declined on eligibility of ITC for foundation and structural works as services were already executed prior to application
AAR Declines ITC Ruling on Foundation Works for Pharma Plant as Activity Already Completed

ITC on RCC Foundation for Lyophilized Injectables Plant Not Ruled Upon as Activity Already Completed: Rajasthan AAR
The applicant, M/s CPL Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, is engaged in manufacturing pharmaceutical products and proposed to set up a lyophilized injectable drugs plant at RIICO Industrial Area, Udaipur. It engaged a contractor to undertake extensive civil and structural works, including excavation, RCC foundations, steel structures, flooring, pipe racks and internal pipelines, which were specifically designed to support heavy plant and machinery such as lyophilizers, vial filling lines, autoclaves and related equipment.
The applicant contended that these works constituted foundation and structural support for “plant and machinery” as defined under the Explanation to Section 17 of the CGST Act, and therefore, input tax credit on such works contract services should be admissible. GST at 18% was paid on the contractor’s invoices, and proportionate ITC was availed during FY 2023–24. The application sought an advance ruling on ITC eligibility under Section 17(5)(c).
Main Issue: Whether input tax credit is admissible on works contract services used for construction of foundation and structural support for plant and machinery installed at the applicant’s factory, in terms of Section 17(5)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017.
AAR Held: The Authority for Advance Ruling declined to give a ruling on merits. It held that an advance ruling under Section 95 of the CGST Act can be issued only in relation to supplies being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken.
In the present case, the construction of foundations and structural supports had already been completed and invoices had been raised and accounted for prior to the filing of the application. The Authority ruled that it was constrained from answering the question and therefore did not extend any ruling on the admissibility of ITC.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2182My Recent Articles
- ITAT: Entire Bogus Billing Bank Credits Cannot Be Taxed as IncomePremium
- ITAT Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Following Supreme Court Limitation RulingsPremium
- ITAT Allows BSNL VRS Exemption Despite Omission in Income Tax ReturnPremium
- ITAT Allows BSNL VRS Tax Exemption Despite No Return ClaimPremium
- ITAT Grants BSNL VRS Exemption Despite No Claim in ReturnPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
Recent Posts

All Posts








