Jeweller Gets Relief! ITAT Deletes 5.90 Cr Cash and 60 Lakh Loan Additions:

Jeweller Gets Relief! ITAT Deletes 5.90 Cr Cash and 60 Lakh Loan Additions

Tribunal quashes Rs. 5.90 Cr addition for cash deposits and Rs. 60 Lakh loan addition; holds all transactions duly explained with proper records.

ITAT Deletes Demonetization Cash Deposits and Unsecured Loan Additions

authorMeetu KumaridateJul 13, 2025
Last update on Jul 13, 2025
Jeweller Gets Relief! ITAT Deletes 5.90 Cr Cash and 60 Lakh Loan Additions The taxpayer, engaged in the jewellery and bullion business as the proprietor, filed his return declaring Rs. 11.52 lakh income for AY 2017-18. The Assessing Officer treated Rs. 5.90 crore cash deposits made during the demonetization period as unexplained money under Section 69A, disregarding the assessee’s detailed submissions, books, cash flow statements, VAT returns, and stock registers showing that the deposits were backed by genuine cash sales disclosed in the income tax return. In addition, the AO added Rs. 60 lakh as an unexplained cash credit under Section 68, raising doubts about an unsecured loan even though the lender had confirmed it and the assessee's books fully disclosed it.
After 102 Days of Wait, Excel Utilities for ITR-2 & ITR-3 Finally Released for AY 2025-26
Issue before Tribunal: Whether unsecured loans and cash deposits made during the demonetization period, backed by confirmed sales, stock records, and other documentation, qualify as unexplained income for Sections 69A and 68.
Demonetisation Cash Deposits Cannot be Doubted if ITR Filed u/s 44AD: ITAT
Tribunal Held: The ITAT deleted both additions, holding that the cash deposits stemmed from regular, disclosed cash sales and sufficient stock, and taxing them separately would result in double taxation. On the unsecured loan, the Tribunal found that identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness were fully established, and the subsequent repayment further supported the transaction's authenticity. The Tribunal also directed that interest under Sections 234B and 234C be computed only on the returned income. The ITAT therefore, allowed the assessee’s appeal in full, deleting both the Rs. 5.90 crore cash deposit addition and the Rs. 60 lakh unsecured loan addition, and explained how to charge the interest. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…