Late Filing of e-Form MR-2 Costs Company and Directors Rs 64,000 Penalty:

The MCA imposed a Rs 64,000 penalty on Munjal Showa Limited and its directors for filing e-form MR-2 six days beyond the statutory deadline under the Companies Act, 2013.
Six-Day Delay in Filing e-Form MR-2 Triggers Penalty

Late Filing of e-Form MR-2 Costs Company and Directors Rs 64,000 Penalty
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Haryana under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has imposed a penalty of Rs 64,000 on the company, Munjal Showa Limited and three of its directors for violating Section 450 of the Companies Act 2013. The penalty has been confirmed through an order no. PO/ADJ/05-2026/HR/02250, dated May 21, 2026.
On May 29, 2024, the disputed company had appointed a Managing Director, under the second provision of Section 196(3)(a) read with Schedule V of the Companies Act, 2013. If the appointment of a Managing Director does not fully satisfy the conditions prescribed in said schedule, i.e., Schedule V, the company is mandated to seek approval from the Central Government by filing e-form MR-2.
According to Rule 7(3) of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, the companies are required to fill this form within 90 days from the date of appointment. However, in the present, the form was filled out on September 03, 2024, which was 6 days late from the prescribed time limit. The company and its directors admitted that the delay was not intentional.
Because of this non-compliance, the company and its directors become liable to penal action under Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013. Consequently, a penalty of Rs 16,000 is imposed on Munjal Showa Limited and Rs 48,000 on its three directors named Pankaj Gupta, Neha Bansal and Yogesh Chander (Rs 16,000 on each).
The company and its officials have been directed to pay the imposed penalty amount and rectify the default within 90 days of receiving the order.
Refer to the official order for complete information.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts









