Madras High Court Restores GST Registration Number Subject to Certain Conditions:

The Madras HC holds that the petitioner's GST registration number will be restored if he fulfils certain conditions within 45 days from the date of order receipt.
HC Quashes GST Cancellation Order

Madras High Court Restores GST Registration Number Subject to Certain Conditions
The Madras High Court holds that the petitioner's GST registration number will be restored if he fulfils certain conditions. The petitioner, Bose Karthikeyan, had challenged an order dated October 25, 2024, passed by the GST authorities. The impugned order had cancelled the petitioner's GST Registration No. 33BBUPK6756M2ZS.
During the hearing of the case in the High Court, the petitioner and the respondent both agreed that a similar issue had already been settled in the past by an earlier judgement passed by the same court in a case titled Tvl. Suguna Cutpiece Center vs The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST), Salem and Erode, Commercial Taxed Building, Pitchards Road, Salem-7. When the court noted that the issue raised in the current case was exactly similar to that in the cited case, it decided to apply the same ruling in the present case.
In conclusion, the court quashed the impugned order dated October 25, 2024, subject to certain conditions. As per the referenced judgement, the petitioner has been instructed to complete filing all his pending GST returns for the period before cancellation, along with payment of any outstanding tax, interest, and applicable penalties, within the time period of 45 days. Note, all such payments must be made in cash and cannot be adjusted using unutilised Input Tax Credit (ITC). Other than these, there are some other conditions as well that the petitioner has to comply with in order to get its GST registration number restored (refer to the official judgement for complete information).
Once the petitioner completes all the aforementioned instructions, the GST registration will be restored. The tax authorities have been instructed to make necessary system amendments to enable compliance and complete the process within the time period of 30 days.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








