Gujarat HC Grants Bail to Advocate in ITC Fraud Case Subject to Certain Conditions:

The Gujarat High Court granted bail to an advocate in a bogus ITC case, noting his limited role and completed investigation.
Bail Granted in Bogus ITC Fraud Case

Gujarat HC Grants Bail to Advocate in ITC Fraud Case Subject to Certain Conditions
The Gujarat High Court granted bail to an advocate in the case related to the availment and passing of bogus ITC without the actual movement of goods, subject to certain conditions.
The case registered by the DGGI Surat Zonal Unit for alleged offences punishable under Sections 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(c) of the GST law, which deal with fraudulent availment and passing of input tax credit. The applicant is an advocate, alleged to have filed GST returns for some companies, which do not exist in reality or are fake. During the hearing before the Gujarat High Court, the applicant argued that he had a limited role in the present case; hence, keeping him in jail for such a long period would be unfair and would serve no purpose. However, the prosecution opposed this applicant's argument and claimed that the offence committed was serious and involved fraud.
When the court analysed the case, it noted that the applicant had admitted the fact that he was aware that the companies for which he had furnished GST returns were non-functional and did not exist in reality. They were merely created for the availment and passing of fraudulent input tax credit (ITC) without any actual movement of goods. However, the Court also observed that his role was limited, mainly related to compliance work and not the major beneficiary in the alleged fraud. The Court further noted that the investigation was complete and the chargesheet had already been filed.
The court cited an earlier ruling of the Supreme Court in the case titled Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), based on similar issue and held that this was a fit case for granting bail. In conclusion, the applicant has been granted bail subject to certain conditions such as furnishing a bond of Rs 50,000, not leaving Gujarat without permission, surrendering his passport, and marking monthly attendance at the police station for six months.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








