Natural Justice Prevails: ITAT Remands Unverified Additions for Re-examination:

Tribunal allows de novo examination of cash gift, joint ownership, and bank transfers from spouse; sets aside full order
ITAT Restores Additions on Unexplained Investments and Bank Credits for Fresh Inquiry

Natural Justice Prevails: ITAT Remands Unverified Additions for Re-examination
The assessee had acquired immovable property valued at Rs. 71.72 lakh. On learning this information, a reassessment notice under Section 148 for AY 2018–19. The assessee filed a NIL income return in response. During the assessment, the AO found the source of funds unexplained and made an addition under Section 69. The AO also identified credit entries in HDFC bank accounts totalling Rs. 221,204 that were unexplained under Section 69A, and another investment of Rs. 21,586 in a Mutual Fund, also unexplained. The assessment proceedings verified all three additions.
CIT(A) Upheld: A home loan of Rs. 5 lakh and an investment of Rs. 13 lakh from AY 2016–17 made up the partial relief that was granted before the CIT(A), leaving Rs. 3,72,077 disallowed. The complete Rs. 221,204 and Rs. 21,586 additions were upheld by the CIT(A) in the appeal. Aggrieved, the assessee filed this appeal before the ITAT.
Main Contention Before ITAT: Whether the additions under Sections 69 and 69A were justified when the assessee submitted confirmations for gifts and claimed joint ownership and spousal fund transfers that were not fully verified by the AO.
ITAT's Decision: The ITAT observed that the assessee had provided confirmation from her mother for a cash gift of Rs. 2 lakh and claimed joint ownership of the immovable property with her husband. On the unexplained bank credits and mutual fund investments, the assessee argued that the amounts were received from her husband’s account, and bank statements were submitted to support the claim.
The Tribunal in view of natural justice, remanded all three issues namely, Rs. 3.72 lakh unexplained investment, Rs. 2.21 lakh bank credits, and Rs. 21,586 mutual fund entry, to the AO for de novo assessment as these explanations and evidence were not thoroughly verified by the AO. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
To Read Full Order, Download PDF Attached Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2232My Recent Articles
- High Court Refuses GST Writ, Directs Appeal Against Fake ITC DemandPremium
- ITAT Restricts Bogus Purchase Addition to 1.15% Profit Element Despite Seller DenialsPremium
- ITAT Upholds Reassessment, Rejects Challenge Over Absence of Section 143(2) NoticePremium
- High Court Quashes Section 148 Notice Based on Wrong Assessee's Investigation ReportPremium
- ITAT Allows Set-Off of Brought Forward Business Loss Against Section 50 Capital GainsPremium
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts










