No GST on delayed payment charges recovered from the client towards trading of securities

No GST on delayed payment charges recovered from the client towards trading of securities The Hon’ble AAAR, Uttar Pradesh in the matter of SPFL Secur…

No GST on delayed payment charges recovered from the client towards trading of securities
The Hon’ble AAAR, Uttar Pradesh in the matter of SPFL Securities Ltd. [Order No. 06/AAAR/18/4/2019, dated April 18, 2019] held that Goods and Services Tax (“GST”) is not liable to be paid on delayed payment charges recovered from the client towards trading of securities upon payment made by them beyond the time stipulated by the stock exchange and SEBI and for which payment is deducted by the stock exchange from the broker’s account.
Facts:
M/s. SPFL Securities Limited (“the Appellant”) is engaged primarily in the business of providing service of stock broking i.e., purchasing and selling of shares on behalf of the clients on exchange platform by virtue of being a recognized BSE/NSE appointed stock broker.
The Appellant submitted application for Advance Ruling dated October 20, 2018, before the Hon’ble AAR, Uttar Pradesh for taxability on delayed payment charges on reimbursement of amount by client to Appellant, where client failed to pay amount paid to Stock Exchanges for purchase of securities with T+1 (trading day plus one day) under SEBI Regulation norms and the amount was deducted by Stock Exchanges from the Appellant’s account being purchase consideration of securities which are neither goods nor service under GST. Whereas, the Hon’ble AAR, Uttar Pradesh vide Advance Ruling Order No. 18, dated December 14, 2018 held that Appellant is liable to pay GST on the delayed payment of charges which are overdue from the client towards trading of securities and reimbursed to them.
Being aggrieved with the abovementioned Order, this appeal application has been filed.
Issue:
Whether GST is payable on delayed payment charges collected by Appellant if a client makes delay in reimbursing the expense to the Appellant and the Appellant charges a certain amount on delay of such reimbursement of expense, for securities purchased for the client?
Held:
The Hon’ble AAAR, Uttar Pradesh in Order No. 06/AAAR/18/4/2019, dated April 18, 2019 held as under:
- Noted that, payments to Stock Exchange, for purchase of securities, where payment are not made by clients for purchase of securities on the Stock Exchange, as per SEBI regulations, stock exchange debits account of the Broker against said purchases. Failing which the business of brokers stands shut by stock exchange under its regulations by closing trading terminal of the stock broker. Client reimburse the said amount to broker with charge for delayed payment. In this case, any amount which is overdue from the client towards trading or on account of any other reason to the broker will be charged from the client at the rate of 18% P.A.
- Observed that the nature of the delayed payment charges are purely a deferment of liability only which arose since the payment was not made within the stipulated period of time by the client to the Stock Exchange for purchase of Securities.
- Noted that, since the service of buying and selling of securities which is exempted under GST, as per the definitions of 'goods' and 'services' under the Section 2(52) and 2(102) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act”) respectively, the corresponding delayed payment charges which are also linked to the above service of trading of securities should also stand exempt under GST.
- Held that the Appellant is not liable to pay GST on the delayed payment charges on reimbursement of amount by client to Appellant, where client failed to pay amount paid to Stock Exchange for purchase of securities with T+1 (trading day plus one day) under SEBI Regulation norms and the amount was deducted by Stock Exchange from the Appellant’s account being purchase consideration of securities which are neither goods nor services under CGST Act.
About Author

A2ZBimal Jain
Chartered Accountant
CA Bimal Jain is a Member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India since May 1994 and Member of Institute of Company Secretaries of India since December 2006 along with a Bachelors degree in Law. Also, he is a Qualified SAP - FI/CO Consultant and has more than 21 years of experience in Indirect Taxation and specializes in all aspects of Service Tax, Value Added Tax (VAT)/ Central Sales Tax (CST), Central Excise, Customs, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Special Economic Zone (SEZ), Export Oriented Unit (EOU), Export-Import Laws and well acquainted with the concept and impact of way forward Goods and Services tax (GST).
A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Delhi, Delhi, India
468My Recent Articles
- Actions taken by the department during enquiry need not necessarily be termed as harassment
- Who are liable to generate e-invoice w.e.f October 1, 2022
- Personal penalty cannot be imposed on the Chairman of the Company for failure in ensuring proper accounting of the goods
- Stayed the order of cancellation of GST Registration of the assessee for continuing the trading activities
- Can CA be arrested- Section 69 vs Section 132 of the CGST Act
Up Next
Loading suggestions…









