Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied when Tax addition is on estimated Income basis: ITAT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied when Tax addition is on estimated Income basis: ITAT In this matter, additions were made in Taxpaye…

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied when Tax addition is on estimated Income basis: ITAT
In this matter, additions were made in Taxpayer's Income to the extent of 8% of purchases, and on appeal, the Hon'ble ITAT has restricted to @4%. Subsequently, the A.O. has initiated the penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act and passed an order for levy of penalty on Taxpayer.
Aggrieved by the penalty order, the assessee has filed an appeal with the CIT(A),
The CIT(A) dealt on the provisions of 271(1)(c) of the Act and relied on the Coordinate Bench of Hon’ble Tribunal and the Hon’ble High Court decisions and observed that no penalty can be levied on estimated income and directed the A.O. to delete the penalty and allowed the assessee’s appeal. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A),the revenue has filed an appeal with the Hon’ble Tribunal.
ITAT Order:
8. We are of the opinion that when the addition is on estimated basis, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied on such adhoc estimated. The disallowance of purchases on ad-hoc/estimated basis does not tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income under the provisions of Section 271(1) (c) of the Act.
To Read Judgment Download PDF Given Below:
About Author

CA Deepak Gupta
Co Founder
CA Deepak Gupta,is Co-founder of Studycafe. He is Microsoft Office Specialist and Corporate Trainer of AI Tools, Microsoft Excel.
He is Finance Influencer having more than 250K followers on Social Media. CA Deepak Gupta, is Having more than 14 plus years of experience, and he has Worked with best brands Like, Hero, Wipro, Ericsson before Starting Studycafe. He has Trained more than 20000 Persons in Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint, Power BI, Google Sheet, Google Forms and Other Tools.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
3423My Recent Articles
- UltraTech Cement slapped with Rs. 808.78 Cr Income Tax Demand
- GST: High Court upheld constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c), asks government to address ITC issues of genuine purchasers
- Old vs New Tax Regime for Tax Year 2026-27
- High court criticizes Income Tax Department for not releasing ITR Utilities despite 11 years of directions
- Fino Payments Bank CEO Rishi Gupta Gets Bail in GST Case, Bank Clarifies No Direct Link
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








