Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Imposed When No Income is Concealed: ITAT:

Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Imposed When No Income is Concealed: ITAT

The ITAT cited the Supreme Court's ruling that a mere wrong claim, without concealing facts, does not amount to "furnishing inaccurate particulars".

ITAT Quashes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty

authorNidhidateApr 17, 2026
Last update on Apr 17, 2026
Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Imposed When No Income is Concealed: ITAT The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore, has ruled that a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be levied if there is no hidden income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The assessee, Smt Subbalakshmi Kurada, filed her return declaring income from house property and interest. The AO observed that she had divided the rental income into rent and hire charges for amenities and had reinvested capital gains jointly with her son. The AO did not accept the bifurcation and the reinvestment of capital gain. As a result, he made an income addition and also levied a penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars.
Income Tax: ITAT condones delay of 400 days in filing appeal, imposes cost on Taxpayer
The taxpayer argued that all the details regarding the rental income and the capital gains were disclosed in the ITR. She said that the classification dispute and capital gain exemption denial cannot result in levying a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. She argued that there is no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Also, previous Tribunal rulings had already accepted the deduction under Section 54.
ITAT Allows Actuarial Employee Benefit Provision; Deletes TDS-Based Disallowances
The ITAT cited the Supreme Court's ruling that a mere wrong claim, without concealing facts, does not amount to "furnishing inaccurate particulars". Since there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, there was no reason for imposing a penalty u/s 271(1)(c). Therefore, the assessee's appeal was allowed.

About Author

LinkedIn

Nidhi

Content Writer

Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833
Up Next

Loading suggestions…