Personal Hearing Marked ‘NA’: Court Strikes Down GST Order for No Hearing:

High Court sets aside a GST order after finding that the show cause notice mentioned ‘NA’ for personal hearing and no opportunity of hearing was granted.
HC holds that GST adjudication without granting opportunity of personal hearing violates principles of natural justice.

Personal Hearing Marked ‘NA’: Court Strikes Down GST Order for No Hearing
M/s Kisan Traders, through its proprietor Shyam Singh, challenged an ex-parte order dated 26.04.2024 passed under Section 73(9) of the GST Act for FY 2018-19, whereby tax, interest and penalty amounting to Rs. 6,75,552/- were imposed.
The petitioner also assailed the show cause notice dated 22.12.2023, contending that it was defective as no date, time, or place of personal hearing was mentioned and only “N.A.” was reflected in the relevant columns. Although replies were filed to the show cause notices, no opportunity of oral hearing was granted before passing the final order.
Issue Raised: Whether an adjudication order under Section 73 of the GST Act can be sustained when no opportunity of personal hearing is granted and the show cause notice itself is procedurally defective.
HC's Ruling: The Allahabad High Court held that the principles laid down in Mahaveer Trading Company v. Deputy Commissioner State Tax squarely applied to the present case. The Court observed that before passing any adverse order, a meaningful opportunity of personal hearing must be offered unless expressly waived by the noticee. The issuance of a show cause notice without specifying the date, time and place of hearing, followed by an ex-parte order, amounted to gross violation of principles of natural justice. The Court further held that in such exceptional cases, the existence of an alternative statutory remedy would not bar the exercise of writ jurisdiction.
Therefore, the impugned ex-parte order dated 26.04.2024 was quashed and set aside, with liberty granted to the Department to issue a fresh show cause notice and proceed in accordance with law.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








