Pipeline Permission Charges Paid to Goa PWD Attract GST Under RCM:

Pipeline Permission Charges Paid to Goa PWD Attract GST Under RCM

Goa AAAR upholds GST reverse charge liability on various charges collected by Goa PWD.

Goa AAAR Confirms GST Liability Under Reverse Charge Mechanism on PWD charges

authorMeetu KumaridateMay 28, 2026
Last update on May 28, 2026
Pipeline Permission Charges Paid to Goa PWD Attract GST Under RCM

The Goa Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling has upheld the ruling that Indian Oil-Adani Gas Private Limited is liable to pay GST under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) on permission charges, reinstatement charges, road cutting charges, and ground rent charges levied by the Goa PWD for laying gas pipelines.

The appellate authority rejected the company’s argument that such charges were part of sovereign or statutory functions of the State and therefore outside the scope of GST. It held that the issue before the Authority was limited to whether GST was payable under Serial No. 5 of Notification No. 13/2017-CT(Rate), and since the service provider was the State Government/PWD and the recipient was a business entity, GST under RCM was applicable.

Delay Not Intentional: ITAT Revives Co-Operative Society’s Appeal in Tax Matter

The authority observed that Goa PWD qualifies as a State Government/local authority and the appellant is admittedly a business entity. Therefore, GST liability under RCM squarely applies.

The AAAR also dismissed the contention that the original advance ruling was invalid for being issued beyond the 90-day period prescribed under Section 98(6) of the CGST Act, observing that the provision is directory and not mandatory because no consequence for delay is prescribed in the statute.

Addition Is Unsustainable When Investment Sources Are Properly Verified Despite ITR Reporting Error: ITAT

Further, the appellate authority refused to decide the larger issue of taxability of the services per se, as the issue of taxability of the services was not raised before the Advance Ruling Authority at the initial stage. Thus, the appeal was dismissed and the advance ruling dated 30.01.2025 was upheld.

To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below.

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2182
Up Next

Loading suggestions…