Reassessment Struck Down: HC Quashes Section 148 Notice Issued on Unverified Information:

Reopening based on vague allegations of accommodation entries without tangible material violates Section 148A safeguards.
Gujarat HC Quashes Section 148 Notice Issued Without Tangible Material

Reassessment Struck Down: HC Quashes Section 148 Notice Issued on Unverified Information
The petitioner challenged a notice dated 31.03.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, along with the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the same date, seeking to reopen assessment for A.Y. 2018-19. The reopening was premised on information allegedly received from “credible sources” suggesting that the petitioner had availed accommodation entries amounting to Rs. 18,79,56,626 from various entities, including RCI Industries and Technologies Limited, without actual supply of goods, thereby claiming fake input tax credit.
The Court repeatedly called upon the Revenue to produce any incriminating or tangible material substantiating the alleged transactions. Despite perusal of the original file, no evidence was shown establishing even a single transaction between the petitioner and the alleged entities.
Issue before Court: Whether reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 148A(b) and 148, based solely on unverified and unreliable information without any tangible material, are legally sustainable.
HC's Order: The High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) as well as the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act. The Court held that the Assessing Officer had resorted to reopening proceedings without verification of the information and without any evidence worth the name to establish the alleged accommodation entries.
The Revenue failed to point out any material connecting the petitioner with RCI Industries and Technologies Limited or any other entity. The Court concluded that initiation of reassessment based on absolutely unreliable information violates the statutory safeguards under Section 148A and cannot be sustained in law.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 648-Day Delay After Assessee Lost Family During COVID, Restores AppealPremium
- ITAT Quashes Rs 2 Crore Penalty as Time-Barred; Limitation Starts from AO’s Reference, Not Show-Cause NoticePremium
- ITAT Remands Appeal After Finding NFAC Ignored 89 Pages of Evidence on Cash Deposits and Flat Improvement CostPremium
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity in Rs 2.63 Crore Foreign Bank Credit Addition CasePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition on Explained Demonetisation Cash DepositsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








