Reassessment Time-Barred: Gujarat HC Quashes Section 148 Notice Issued Beyond ‘Surviving Time’:

Notices issued under the new reassessment regime after expiry of surviving limitation under TOLA are invalid
Gujarat HC Quashes Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond Surviving Limitation

Reassessment Time-Barred: Gujarat HC Quashes Section 148 Notice Issued Beyond ‘Surviving Time’
The petitioner, Neerav Rameshbhai Shah, challenged a reassessment notice dated 20.07.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2017–18. Earlier, the Assessing Officer had issued a notice under Section 148 on 24.06.2021 during the extended period provided under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020.
In Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal, the said notice was deemed to be a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. The Assessing Officer supplied information to the petitioner, granted time to file reply, and thereafter passed an order under Section 148A(d) and issued a fresh notice under Section 148. The petitioner contended that the impugned notice was issued beyond the permissible limitation period, reckoned on the basis of “surviving time” as clarified by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal.
Issue Before Court: Whether a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act after expiry of the “surviving time” available under TOLA, read with the decisions in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal, is valid in law.
HC's Ruling: The Hon'ble High Court held that the reassessment notice dated 20.07.2022 was issued beyond the permissible “surviving time” available to the Revenue. The Court observed that the Assessing Officer had supplied information on 25.05.2022, and even after allowing the statutory response period, the outer limitation for issuance of notice under Section 148 expired on 15.06.2022.
Relying on Rajeev Bansal, the Court reiterated that all reassessment notices issued beyond the surviving limitation period are time-barred and invalid. As the impugned notice was issued after expiry of the surviving time, it was held to be invalid. Thus, the notice and all consequential proceedings were quashed and set aside.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 648-Day Delay After Assessee Lost Family During COVID, Restores AppealPremium
- ITAT Quashes Rs 2 Crore Penalty as Time-Barred; Limitation Starts from AO’s Reference, Not Show-Cause NoticePremium
- ITAT Remands Appeal After Finding NFAC Ignored 89 Pages of Evidence on Cash Deposits and Flat Improvement CostPremium
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity in Rs 2.63 Crore Foreign Bank Credit Addition CasePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition on Explained Demonetisation Cash DepositsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








