ROC Chandigarh Imposes Rs 50,000 Penalty on Director for Holding Dual DINs:

ROC Chandigarh fined a company director Rs 50,000 for non-compliance after she mistakenly obtained and failed to surrender a duplicate DIN.
Failure to Surrender Duplicate DIN Leads to Penalty

ROC Chandigarh Imposes Rs 50,000 Penalty on Director for Holding Dual DINs
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Chandigarh has imposed a penalty amounting to Rs 50,000 on Sadhika Gupta, director of a company named Ambika Wheels Private Limited, for the violation of Section 159 of the Companies Act, 2013, through an order dated March 23, 2026, passed under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The company in default had voluntarily furnished an application under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014, acknowledging the non-compliance committed by it under Section 155 of the Companies Act, 2013. One of the directors of the company, named Smt Sadhika Gupta, had obtained two DINs (01164755 and 10103755) in the years 2007 and 2023, respectively. She claimed that the issuance of the second DIN, i.e., 10103755, was not intentional and was mistakenly issued on April 06 due to the lack of awareness and without any bad intention. The second DIN was supposed to be surrendered.
Any non-compliance committed under Sections 152, 155, or 156 of the Companies Act is liable for imposition of a penalty up to Rs 50,000. If the default is not rectified even after reminders, an extra penalty of up to Rs 500 per day can be imposed for each day the default continues after the first day. Considering the same, the office has imposed a penalty of Rs 50,000 on director Sadhika Gupta and directed her to rectify the default and pay the levied penalty amount within 90 days from the date of receiving the order.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2490My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands TDS Appeal After CIT(A) Failed to Decide Actual CAM Charges IssuePremium
- ITAT Rules in Taxpayer's Favour, Holds Delay in Filing Form 67 Cannot Be Sole Ground to Deny Foreign Tax CreditPremium
- ITAT Revives Tax Appeals for Six AYs After Finding Insufficient Hearing Time and Ignored Adjournment RequestPremium
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.39 Crore Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition After Main Director’s DeathPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer Fresh Opportunity to Contest Rs 44.16 Lakh Addition After Finding No Decision on MeritsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








