ROC Chandigarh Imposes Rs 50,000 Penalty on Director for Holding Dual DINs:

ROC Chandigarh fined a company director Rs 50,000 for non-compliance after she mistakenly obtained and failed to surrender a duplicate DIN.
Failure to Surrender Duplicate DIN Leads to Penalty

ROC Chandigarh Imposes Rs 50,000 Penalty on Director for Holding Dual DINs
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Chandigarh has imposed a penalty amounting to Rs 50,000 on Sadhika Gupta, director of a company named Ambika Wheels Private Limited, for the violation of Section 159 of the Companies Act, 2013, through an order dated March 23, 2026, passed under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The company in default had voluntarily furnished an application under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014, acknowledging the non-compliance committed by it under Section 155 of the Companies Act, 2013. One of the directors of the company, named Smt Sadhika Gupta, had obtained two DINs (01164755 and 10103755) in the years 2007 and 2023, respectively. She claimed that the issuance of the second DIN, i.e., 10103755, was not intentional and was mistakenly issued on April 06 due to the lack of awareness and without any bad intention. The second DIN was supposed to be surrendered.
Any non-compliance committed under Sections 152, 155, or 156 of the Companies Act is liable for imposition of a penalty up to Rs 50,000. If the default is not rectified even after reminders, an extra penalty of up to Rs 500 per day can be imposed for each day the default continues after the first day. Considering the same, the office has imposed a penalty of Rs 50,000 on director Sadhika Gupta and directed her to rectify the default and pay the levied penalty amount within 90 days from the date of receiving the order.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2729My Recent Articles
- Max Healthcare Faces NCLT Proceedings Over Kalinga Hospital; Next Hearing Scheduled for Sept 28
- Mere Assumptions Cannot Sustain Addition: Rs 15.72 Lakh Cash Addition Deleted After ITAT Finds No Incriminating EvidencePremium
- ITAT Allows Normal Tax Rate on Rs 75 Lakh Survey Surrender, Rejects 60% Section 115BBE LevyPremium
- HC Sets Aside Ex Parte Adjudication Order After SCN Merely Uploaded on GST Portal under 'Additional Notice and Orders' TabPremium
- ITAT Sets Aside Section 263 Revision Order After PCIT Lacked Jurisdiction to Revise Issue Already Considered by CIT(A)Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








