ROC Imposes Rs. 1.4 Lakh Penalty for Incomplete Allottee Details in PAS-3 Filing:

Adjudicating Officer Imposes Fines on Company and Directors for Non-Compliance with Section 406
ROC Imposes Penalties on Company for Statutory Violations under Companies Act 2013

ROC Imposes Rs. 1.4 Lakh Penalty for Incomplete Allottee Details in PAS-3 Filing
The Registrar of Companies (ROC), initiated adjudication proceedings against Sri Narayani Benefit Fund Nidhi Limited and its officers for non-compliance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, specifically concerning the regulatory framework for Nidhi companies. The company was found to have violated Section 406 of the Act read with the Nidhi Rules, 2014. Despite being a registered Nidhi company, it failed to adhere to the mandatory operational requirements and statutory filings prescribed for such entities.
An adjudication notice was issued, and although a hearing was scheduled, the company could not sufficiently demonstrate compliance with the regulatory standards required to maintain its status and operational legitimacy.
Issue Before Registrar: Whether the company and its directors are liable for penalties under Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013, for contravening the provisions of Section 406 and the Nidhi Rules, where no specific penalty is provided elsewhere in the Act.
ROC's Ruling: The Adjudicating Officer found the company and its directors guilty of the violations and imposed a total penalty of Rs. 1,40,000. Under Section 450, where no specific penalty is provided for a contravention, the company and every officer in default are liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees, and in case of continuing contravention, a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day.
The ROC imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000 on the Company and Rs. 30,000 each on the three directors. The order specifically directed that the penalties imposed on the directors must be paid from their personal income and warned of further action under Section 454(8) for non-payment.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2255My Recent Articles
- ITAT Allows Section 80-IE Deduction on Enhanced Business Income After Assessment AdditionPremium
- India Notifies India-Sri Lanka DTAA Protocol Introducing Principal Purpose Test
- ITAT: Entire Gross Receipts of Trust Cannot Be Taxed Despite Section 11 DenialPremium
- ITAT Quashes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty After Original Assessment Was Set AsidePremium
- ITAT Remands Rs 36.60 Crore TP Adjustment in Veolia Intra-Group Services CasePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








