ROC Mumbai Imposes Penalty for Incorrect AOC-4 XBRL Filing:

ROC fined a director of the company Rs 10,000 for incorrectly declaring CSR as not applicable in the AOC-4 XBRL filing.
Director Penalized for Wrong Disclosure

ROC Mumbai Imposes Penalty for Incorrect AOC-4 XBRL Filing
The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Mumbai, imposed a penalty on a director of a company named Complete Sports and Management India Ltd for the incorrect filing of E-form AOC-4 XBRL.
Background of the company
As per Rule 8(1) and 8(3) of the Companies (Registration Office and Fees) Rules, 2014, every electronic form must be signed using a digital signature. Also, the person who signs and certifies the form is responsible for ensuring that all the information and attached documents are correct.
In this case, the company filed the AOC-4 XBRL form on 01.02.2026. While filing, it was mistakenly mentioned that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) provisions were not applicable, even though they actually were applicable. The form was digitally signed and declared by the director of the company.
Since the authorised signatory is responsible for the accuracy of the form, the director of the company is liable for a penalty under Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013, for this mistake.
As a result, the ROC imposed a Rs 10,000 penalty on the company's director.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1636My Recent Articles
- ITAT Allows Fresh Opportunity in Dispute Over Suppressed Sales and Commission ExpensesPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 2.13 Crore Addition Under Section 68, Grants Major Tax ReliefPremium
- ITAT: Protective Addition Cannot Survive After Substantive Assessment Is QuashedPremium
- ITAT Remands Rs 8.12 Crore Cash Withdrawal Disallowance Case to AO for Fresh AssessmentPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 1.20 Crore Disallowance on Business Development and Marketing ExpensesPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








