ROC Penalises Company and Directors Over Non-Maintenance of Statutory Registers:

ROC passed an adjudication order against a company for failing to maintain mandatory statutory registers as required under Section 88 of the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Acts Against Failure to Maintain Statutory Registers

ROC Penalises Company and Directors Over Non-Maintenance of Statutory Registers
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Ranchi has issued an order of adjudication dated February 05, 2026, imposing a penalty amounting to Rs. 2 lakh on a company named Thakur Life Care Private Limited and its two directors.
Every company, under Section 88 of the Companies Act, 2013, is required to keep and maintain a few official registers. These include (a) a register of members indicating separately for each class of equity and preference shares held by each member residing in or outside India; (b) a register of debenture holders; and (c) a register of any other security holders.
When the company in question was investigated by the concerned authority, it was found that the company had not maintained any of these registers of its members. This was an explicit contravention of the provisions of section 88 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Considering the same, ROC Ranchi held the company and its directors liable for penal action under Section 88(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, and imposed a penalty of Rs. 1.5 lakh on the company and Rs. 50,000 on Shashank Shekha and Mayank Shekhar (Rs. 25,000 on each).
Additionally, directed to pay the imposed penalty amount and rectify the default within the time period of 90 days from the receipt date of the order.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2487My Recent Articles
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.39 Crore Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition After Main Director’s DeathPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer Fresh Opportunity to Contest Rs 44.16 Lakh Addition After Finding No Decision on MeritsPremium
- Trust’s Sections 12AB and 80G Registration Cannot Be Denied Before Charitable Project Is Completed, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Says Identity and Creditworthiness Irrelevant Where Loan Was Directly Paid to Haryana Mining DepartmentPremium
- Earlier Rejection Cannot Be Sole Ground to Reject Fresh Section 12AB and 80G Registration Applications, Says ITATPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








