ROC Penalises Company and Directors Over Non-Maintenance of Statutory Registers:

ROC passed an adjudication order against a company for failing to maintain mandatory statutory registers as required under Section 88 of the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Acts Against Failure to Maintain Statutory Registers

ROC Penalises Company and Directors Over Non-Maintenance of Statutory Registers
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Ranchi has issued an order of adjudication dated February 05, 2026, imposing a penalty amounting to Rs. 2 lakh on a company named Thakur Life Care Private Limited and its two directors.
Every company, under Section 88 of the Companies Act, 2013, is required to keep and maintain a few official registers. These include (a) a register of members indicating separately for each class of equity and preference shares held by each member residing in or outside India; (b) a register of debenture holders; and (c) a register of any other security holders.
When the company in question was investigated by the concerned authority, it was found that the company had not maintained any of these registers of its members. This was an explicit contravention of the provisions of section 88 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Considering the same, ROC Ranchi held the company and its directors liable for penal action under Section 88(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, and imposed a penalty of Rs. 1.5 lakh on the company and Rs. 50,000 on Shashank Shekha and Mayank Shekhar (Rs. 25,000 on each).
Additionally, directed to pay the imposed penalty amount and rectify the default within the time period of 90 days from the receipt date of the order.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








