ROC Penalises Director for Incorrect Charge Disclosure in Financial Statements:

ROC imposed a Rs. 10,000 penalty on a company director for incorrect disclosure of charges in financial statements and failure to comply with audit reporting requirements.
Director Penalised for Non-Disclosure of Charges and Audit Reporting Lapse

ROC Penalises Director for Incorrect Charge Disclosure in Financial Statements
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Guwahati has issued an order of adjudication dated February 04, 2026, imposing a penalty amounting to Rs. 10,000 on the director of a company named Bhartia Infra Projects Limited.
Through a letter dated February 19, 2024, the concerned authority ordered an inspection into the affairs of Bhartia Infra Projects Limited. The inspection concluded that the company in the note no. 41 to the Financial Statements for the Year ended 31.03.2023 had disclosed, "The company does not have any charge required to be registered or satisfied with ROC during the year."
However, according to the MCA portal, there are a total of 43 charges created in Financial Year 2022-23. Therefore, the statutory auditor of the disputed company has been unable to qualify the same in his audit report for the financial year 2022-23 and hence contravenes the provision of section 143(3)(h) of the Companies Act, 2013. Considering the same, ROC Guwahati imposed a penalty amounting to Rs. 10,000 on Amlan Bhadra, director of the disputed company.
The director has been directed to rectify the default and pay the imposed amount of penalty within the time of 90 days.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








