ROC Slaps Penalty on Company and Directors for Failure to File Consolidated Financial Statements:

The ROC imposed a Rs. 3 lakh penalty on the company and its two directors for violating Companies Act, 2013 provisions by failing to file consolidated financial statements for FY 2018-19.
Company Penalised Over Section 137 Non-Compliance

ROC Slaps Penalty on Company and Directors for Failure to File Consolidated Financial Statements
The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Gwalior, has imposed a penalty amounting to Rs 3 lakh on the company, Xtranet Technologies Limited, and its two directors under Section 454 of the Companies Act 2013, through an order of adjudication dated March 03, 2026. The penal action has been taken for the violation of Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.
The disputed company, having CIN U72200MP2002PLC014956, had voluntarily filed an application for adjudication, acknowledging non-compliance committed by it by violating provisions of Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 12 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. The said application was furnished using e-Form GNL-1, SRN: AB7190596, on September 23, 2025.
When the ROC verified the facts mentioned in the application, it noted that the company had indeed violated provisions of Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013, as the company was legally required to prepare Consolidated Financial Statements (CFS) of itself and its subsidiary using the same form and format as used for its own in Form AOC-4 CFS, along with the prescribed fees with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for the financial year 2018-19.
At the time of filing the same form, in answer to the question, 'Whether consolidated financial statements are required or not', the company had wrongly selected 'No'. This selection eliminated the requirement of filing consolidated financial statements; consequently, the company did not file Form AOC-4 CFS for the financial year 2018-19. However, the company claimed that this was a genuine mistake, not made intentionally.
Considering the mistake accepted by the company, the ROC imposed a penalty amounting to Rs. 2 lakh on the company, Xtranet Technologies Limited, and Rs. 1 lakh on its two directors, Jogendrapal Singh Alagh and Sukhbir Singh Kukreja (Rs. 50,000 on each director). The company has been awarded a time limit of 90 days to rectify the default and pay the levied penalty amount.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2460My Recent Articles
- ITAT Strikes Down Entire Reassessment Proceedings Over Unsigned Section 148 NoticePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 271B Penalty, Holds Form 3CD Reporting Error Covered Under Reasonable CausePremium
- A Taxpayer Cannot Be Forced to Pay GST Twice Merely Because Tax Paid Under Wrong Head, Rules High CourtPremium
- ITAT Restores Appeal After Condoning 1,929-Day Delay Caused by Director’s Jail Term and IllnessPremium
- Partial Tax Refund Must Be Adjusted Against Interest First, ITAT Upholds Section 244A Refund Interest ComputationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








