Section 41(1) Cannot be Invoked Without P&L Credit Proof: ITAT Deletes Cessation Addition:

Section 41(1) Cannot be Invoked Without P&L Credit Proof: ITAT Deletes Cessation Addition The assessee, J L G Developers Ltd, received Rs 8,22,08,000 from Sethi Housing, which was used to repay a loan from the Bank of India. The amount was still returnable to M/s Sethi Housing. However, the AO treated the amount received by the assessee as cessation of liability, which resulted in making an addition to the assessee's income. The AO argued that this liability had ceased under Section 41(1) of the Act, citing the striking off of the company in 2017.

Also Read

ITAT Remands Ex-Parte CIT(A) Order for De Novo Adjudication

However, the assessee argued that being struck off under section 248 of the Companies Act due to non-compliance does not mean the company is winding up under the Act, and it is just a temporary removal from the ROC. However, the company's legal obligation and its liabilities do not end. The assessee also submitted detailed documentary evidence, including the Profit & Loss Account, Balance Sheets, and ITR acknowledgements for the F.Ys 2010-11 to 2018-19, which proved that the assessee had not claimed any deductions towards this liability in the earlier years, and the said liability was still outstanding in the books. The CIT(A) ruled in favour of the company, deleting the addition. Aggrieved by this order, the revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT, Delhi. The Tribunal stated that to invoke Section 41(1), the assessee must credit the said liability to its profit and loss account, which was not the case here, as the assessee neither wrote back nor credited the liability in the P&L account. Therefore, the assessee did not violate the provisions of section 41(1).

Also Read

ITAT Delhi Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition Made Under 69 Without Rejecting Books of Accounts

Further, the tribunal found that the said liability is not a trading liability but a capital liability, which was used to repay the loan. The Tribunal ruled in the assessee's favour, holding that the liability is a loan which is outstanding and is not written back in the P & L account. Therefore, the revenue's appeal was rejected.