News

HDFC Life faces a Rs 3,365 crore GST demand and penalty, and plans to challenge the order before the GST Appellate Tribunal.

HDFC Life Faces Rs 3,365 Crore GST Demand, Penalty; To Appeal Order

Judgement

ITAT admitted Deegee Software’s additional ground on the tax treatment of rental income and restored the dispute to the AO for fresh consideration.

ITAT Remands Deegee Software Rental Income Dispute to AO for Fresh Adjudication

ITAT Pune condones years-long delay in filing tax appeal, citing reasonable cause and directing CIT(A) to reconsider the matter afresh.

ITAT Takes Lenient View on Long Delay, Remands Tax Dispute for Fresh Hearing After Taxpayer Claims He Was Unaware of Proceedings

ITAT Delhi quashed the Rs 2.67 crore penalty, holding that the AO’s failure to clearly specify the penalty charge in the Section 271(1)(c) notice rendered the proceedings invalid.

Rs 2.67 Crore Income Tax Penalty Quashed by ITAT as AO Failed to Clearly Specify Whether Case Involved Concealment or Inaccurate Particulars

Max Healthcare has disclosed that the NCLT Cuttack Bench has directed it and other respondents to file replies in the BRS Capital proceedings involving subsidiary Kalinga Hospital.

Max Healthcare Faces NCLT Proceedings Over Kalinga Hospital; Next Hearing Scheduled for Sept 28

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has declared Section 147A of the Income tax Act, 1961 unconstitutional. 


Explore Our Blogs

Stay updated with the latest insights, tips, and industry trends from our experts

HDFC Life Faces Rs 3,365 Crore GST Demand, Penalty; To Appeal Order

ITAT Remands Deegee Software Rental Income Dispute to AO for Fresh Adjudication

ITAT Takes Lenient View on Long Delay, Remands Tax Dispute for Fresh Hearing After Taxpayer Claims He Was Unaware of Proceedings

Rs 2.67 Crore Income Tax Penalty Quashed by ITAT as AO Failed to Clearly Specify Whether Case Involved Concealment or Inaccurate Particulars

Max Healthcare Faces NCLT Proceedings Over Kalinga Hospital; Next Hearing Scheduled for Sept 28

High Court Holds Retrospective Section 147A of Income Tax Act As Unconstitutional