TeamLease Services Limited Faces 184.58 Crore EPFO SCN Over Fund-Management Issues:

TeamLease Services Limited has received a Rs 184.58 crore SCN from EPFO over alleged fund management irregularities, which the company has disputed and may legally challenge.
Company Calls Demand Unjustified; Plans to Challenge

TeamLease Services Limited Faces 184.58 Crore EPFO SCN Over Fund-Management Issues
TeamLease Services Limited has disclosed to the stock exchange of India that it has received a Show Cause Notice (SCN), dated April 13, 2026, issued by the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India. The company had received the notice on April 23, 2026.
In the said notice, the EPFO has alleged that the company is involved in certain violations concerning the administration and management of funds by the Employees’ Provident Fund Trust. The key issues include investment losses, losses on the sale of bonds and debentures, misappropriation of reserves and certain employee-related amounts depicted as recoverable. For clarification regarding the same, the authority has sought the relevant supporting documentation.
The notice has proposed an aggregate tax demand amounting to Rs 184.58 crore (including interest) on the company. However, the company has disagreed with this amount and stated that it had earlier taken clarification from the Regional Provident Fund Office in Bengaluru, which allowed the employer to fund only the shortfall as per its balance sheet. The company claims it has already funded this shortfall on March 30, 2022.
Presently, the company is thoroughly analysing the notice and cooperating with authorities to resolve the matter. It has also claimed that it will adopt relevant legal steps to challenge the demand, if required.
The company has disclosed the aforesaid information through an intimation dated April 28, 2026, addressed to the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) Limited and the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) Limited, issued under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
The company has claimed that it has made a delay of 5 days in furnishing this intimation due to some unavoidable administrative reasons and the time needed to determine whether the notice was significant.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








