Entertainment Network India Challenges Rs 113.20 Crore Income Tax Assessment Order Before CIT(A):

Entertainment Network (India) Limited discloses to the stock exchange about an appeal filed against an income tax assessment order, imposing a demand of Rs 113.20 crore on the company.
Company Informs Stock Exchange About Rs 113.20 Crore Demand Order

Entertainment Network India Challenges Rs 113.20 Crore Income Tax Assessment Order Before CIT(A)
Entertainment Network (India) Limited has disclosed that on April 26, 2026, it filed an appeal before the Honourable Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], challenging an income tax assessment order dated March 27, 2026, passed by the Assessment Unit of the Income Tax Department under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The said order had imposed a tax demand amounting to Rs 113.20 crore (including applicable interest) on the company, alleging certain additions/adjustments to the income reported by it for the assessment year 2024-25 (financial year 2023-24).
The company had earlier disclosed the receipt of this income tax assessment order through a regulatory filing dated March 29, 2026. For that, the company had clarified that it was not satisfied with the demand levied and believed it had sufficient legal and factual grounds to challenge the same before an appropriate judicial authority.
The company, in the end, clarified that the impugned demand notice and order do not have any major impact on its financial position, operations, or other activities. The aforementioned disclosure has been made by the company under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, through a regulatory filing dated April 27, 2026, addressed to the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) Limited and the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) Limited.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2460My Recent Articles
- ITAT Strikes Down Entire Reassessment Proceedings Over Unsigned Section 148 NoticePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 271B Penalty, Holds Form 3CD Reporting Error Covered Under Reasonable CausePremium
- A Taxpayer Cannot Be Forced to Pay GST Twice Merely Because Tax Paid Under Wrong Head, Rules High CourtPremium
- ITAT Restores Appeal After Condoning 1,929-Day Delay Caused by Director’s Jail Term and IllnessPremium
- Partial Tax Refund Must Be Adjusted Against Interest First, ITAT Upholds Section 244A Refund Interest ComputationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








