95.89 Lakh Cash seizure during Train Journey from Senior Citizen: ITAT uphold addition u/s 69A:

95.89 Lakh Cash seizure during Train Journey from Senior Citizen: ITAT uphold addition u/s 69A

ITAT upheld addition u/s 69A against Senior Citizen who was found with Rs. 95.89 Lakh Cash during Train Journey

Addition u/s 69A for cash seized during train journey

authorCA Pratibha GoyaldateJun 6, 2025
Last update on Jun 6, 2025
95.89 Lakh Cash seizure during Train Journey from Senior Citizen: ITAT uphold addition u/s 69A Shri Chatru Lal Meena, a resident of Nimod, Sawai Madhopur, was found carrying Rs. 95,89,000 in cash with another individual, Shri Ramavatar Meena, during a train journey in February 2020. The cash was seized under Section 102 CrPC by the GRP, Kota, and later requisitioned by the IT Department under Section 132A of the Income Tax Act.
ROC Imposes Penalty of 3.275 Lakh for Holding Duplicate DIN
The assessee claimed cash belonged to M/s Meena Construction Works, a partnership firm. He was one of the partners in the firm. The cash was the total contribution of 10 partners, and he was carrying the cash with the intention of machinery purchase from Odisha. Unfortunately, upon reaching Bhubaneshwar it was discovered that the vendor, Shri Ravi Jain proprietor of Shri Mahaveer Associates from whom the said old second-hand machineries was to be purchased was not available due to last minute emergency. He also filed affidavits and documents to substantiate capital contributions by partners. However, the Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) rejected the assessee’s explanations, leading to assessments and additions under Sections 69A, 68, 56(2)(x) and tax levied under Section 115BBE.
Bank employee steals 4.58 Cr from Fixed deposit of customers, loses all in stock market
However, the department argued that the firm was established but it was not registered with any of the government agencies. The Firm has not fulfilled the requirement of registration under GST, allotment of PAN, opening of bank accounts, which are the basic requirements to start any business. There has been no activity in the firm since inception. The tribunal agreed with AO’s finding that the story of the partnership firm and machinery purchase was fabricated. Lack of evidence like PAN, books of account, and activity made the firm's existence and cash source dubious.
Mere repeated uploading GST Notice on GST Portal Without Ensuring Their Receipt Not Effective Service: HC
Accordingly, additions made by the Income Tax Department were affirmed.

About Author

CA Pratibha Goyal

Co Founder

CA Pratibha Goyal is Chartered Accountant qualified in 2016, is a Member of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India having wide experience in the field of Auditing, Taxation, ROC, GST and Secretarial matters etc. She has written over a thousand articles & has made several videos on topics related to Auditing & Taxation. As a Speaker she has delivered various sessions on various branches of NIRC of ICAI.
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1486
Up Next

Loading suggestions…