Cost-to-cost reimbursements of foreign entity cannot be subjected to withholding tax as FTS/royalty: SC

Supreme Court upholds NIL TDS on reimbursements lacking “make available” of technical services.

Supreme Court dismisses Revenue SLP, affirms High Court ruling

Meetu Kumari | May 5, 2026 |

Cost-to-cost reimbursements of foreign entity cannot be subjected to withholding tax as FTS/royalty: SC

Cost-to-cost reimbursements of foreign entity cannot be subjected to withholding tax as FTS/royalty: SC

AECOM Technical Services Inc. Is a company based in the United States. This company got money from its partners in India. The money was for things like shared services. Help with running the business. AECOM Technical Services Inc. Asked for a certificate so they do not have to pay tax on this money. They said the money was just to pay back expenses and did not include any profit.

The person in charge of checking taxes said no to this request. They thought the money was actually for help or for using something that belonged to someone else. AECOM Technical Services Inc. Did not agree with this decision. They went to the High Court. Said they did not provide any new technology to companies in India. So they thought the money should not be taxed in India.

Central Issue: Whether cost-to-cost reimbursements received by a foreign entity can be subjected to withholding tax as FTS/royalty under the India–USA DTAA, particularly when the “make available” condition is not satisfied. ?

SC Decided: The Supreme Court ruled in favour of the company. They told the government to give a certificate that says the company does not have to pay any tax. The court said the work done did not need to be taxed under India’s rules with other countries. This was because no technical knowledge was shared. The court also said tax officials must follow Supreme Court decisions. They cannot ignore them even if someone wants a review. The government appealed to the Supreme Court of India but was unsuccessful.

The Supreme Court forgave the government for delaying the appeal. However, they still rejected the appeal, agreeing with the High Court that the company should not pay withholding tax now. The court said the government can still check if the company should pay taxes later. The High Court and Supreme Court made decisions on withholding tax for the company and the government’s revenue. The courts said the company should get a withholding tax certificate.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below.

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
Custom: An Appeal Cannot Be Rejected at the Filing Stage merely For Non-Payment of Pre-Deposit HC Grants Relief in High-Profile Counterfeit Drug Case Supreme Court Affirms Rejection of Belated Writ Petition Filed After 2½ Years No ITC Benefit Passed On; GSTAT Orders Refund to homebuyers High Court Penalises Bank for Unlawful Freezing of AccountView All Posts