Addition Based on Third-Party Statement Sent Back for Fresh Consideration by ITAT:

Addition Based on Third-Party Statement Sent Back for Fresh Consideration by ITAT

ITAT Ahmedabad remands Rs 63.75 lakh cash addition to CIT(A), granting the assessee a final opportunity to submit evidence.

ITAT Restores Rs 63.75 Lakh Addition Case to CIT(A)

authorVanshika vermadateDec 17, 2025
Last update on Dec 17, 2025
Addition Based on Third-Party Statement Sent Back for Fresh Consideration by ITAT ITAT Ahmedabad set aside the CIT(A)’s order confirming Rs 63.75 lakh cash addition made based on a third-party statement. The matter was remanded to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, granting the assessee a final opportunity to explain the source of cash with proper evidence.
ITAT Shields Employee from Employer’s TDS Default, Allows Credit Despite 26AS Mismatch
The present appeal has been filed by Mahendra Manilal Shah (Appellant) against the Income Tax Officer, Ward, Ahmedabad (Respondent) in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) "A" Bench, Ahmedabad, before Dr B.R.R. Kumar (Vice-President) and Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member). The case is related to the assessment year 2012-13 and was decided on December 12, 2025. The appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated August 10, 2025, passed by the CIT(A). The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A), arguing that the AO had made an addition of Rs 63,75,000 based on a third-party statement and without any proper evidence. However, the CIT(A) upheld the addition because the assessee did not submit the required details despite multiple opportunities. Being aggrieved with the CIT(A) decision, the assessee further approached the ITAT. Tribunal noticed that the assessee was offered multiple opportunities for hearing to report details and clarifications to explain the source of the cash payment of Rs 63,75,000. However, the assessee failed to reply before the CIT(A). Before the Tribunal, the assessee requested one more chance to submit all necessary documents and explanations. Considering this request and in the interest of justice, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)’s order and sent the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration.
ITAT Accepts Condonation of Delay as Income Tax Communication Received on Wrong Email
Tribunal also directed the assessee to submit all relevant bank statements and documents and to fully cooperate without seeking unnecessary adjournments.

About Author

Vanshika verma

Content Writer

Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1540
Up Next

Loading suggestions…