Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited Hits With Rs 4.85 Crore Demand Over Alleged Stamp Duty Shortfall:

Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited has received a Rs 4.85 crore demand over alleged short payment of stamp duty and registration fees, which it plans to challenge legally.
Company Plans to Challenge Demand, Says No Impact on Operations

Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited Hits With Rs 4.85 Crore Demand Over Alleged Stamp Duty Shortfall
Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited has informed the stock exchange that it has received an order dated March 16, 2026, passed by the Honourable Court of the Revenue Board, Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior. The company had received the said order on March 23, 2026.
The order raised allegations against the company that it had made short payments of stamp duty and registration fees related to the transfer of Century Yarn and Denim Units during FY 2021-22. Consequently, the company has now been asked to pay additional charges due to the alleged undervaluation of land and non-payment of stamp duty on plant and machinery.
The demand includes approximately Rs 2.60 crore on land valuation and about Rs 2.24 crore on plant and machinery, taking the total demand to nearly Rs 4.85 crore. The company has clarified that the present action does not impact its financial, operational, and business activities. Additionally, believes the order is invalid and unfair, hence planning to challenge the same before the relevant appellate authority.
The company has made the aforementioned disclosure to the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through a regulatory filing dated March 24, 2026, issued under Regulation 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
| Particulars | Details |
| Company's Name | Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited |
| Issuing Authority | Hon'ble Court of Revenue Board, Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior |
| Assessment Year | 2022-23 |
| Demand Raised | Rs 4.85 crore (Rs 2.60 crore on land valuation and about Rs 2.24 crore on plant and machinery) |
| Date of Receipt of Order | March 23, 2026 |
| Impact on Financial, Operational and Other Activities | No Impact |
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2622My Recent Articles
- Mere Expense Disallowance Cannot Trigger Section 271(1)(c) Penalty; ITAT Partly Allows AppealPremium
- ROC: Company and Directors Faces Penalty for Not Having Any Office at Registered Location of BusinessPremium
- ROC Imposes Penalty on Company and Director for Failure to Furnish Financial Statements for FY 2021-22
- ICSI Seeks Further Extension of CCFS 2026 Beyond August 31 Amid Technical Issues on MCA-21 Portal
- ICSI Submits Follow-Up Representation to MCA, Seeks Resolution of 17 Key Issues to Improve MCA-21 Compliance
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Tags
Recent Posts
All Posts







