Big Relief for Non-Profits: Event Income Within 20% Limit, Not Commercial:

Tribunal rules that entrepreneurship-focused programmes qualify under “General Public Utility,” and commercial receipts do not breach the Section 2(15) threshold
ITAT Grants Section 11 Exemption to TiE Hyderabad; Event Income Within 20% Limit

Big Relief for Non-Profits: Event Income Within 20% Limit, Not Commercial
The assessee, The Indus Entrepreneurs (TiE), is a registered society and part of TiE Global, functioning as a non-profit platform promoting entrepreneurship through education, mentoring, and networking programs. It is registered under Section 12A and filed a NIL return for AY 2018-19 after claiming exemption under Section 11. During scrutiny, the Assessing Officer took the view that TiE was not a charitable organisation but a commercial body engaged in trade, commerce, or business falling under “General Public Utility” (GPU). The AO relied on the fee-based nature of certain activities to conclude that the exemption must be denied.
The AO assessed the surplus of Rs. 33.80 lakh as business income. On appeal, the NFAC upheld the denial of exemption, but on non-filing of Form 10 despite the assessee’s contention that Form 10 had been duly filed along with the return. Aggrieved, the assessee approached the ITAT.
Issue Raised: Whether the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 11, considering its objects, nature of activities, Section 2(15) proviso, and the AO’s allegation of commercial receipts exceeding limits.
ITAT Decided: The Tribunal held that the assessee's activities do not fall under the purview of “education” but fall under “advancement of any other object of general public utility.” Once categorised as a GPU, the key is to check compliance with the proviso to Section 2(15), i.e., whether receipts from trade, commerce, or business exceed 20% of total receipts. The tribunal found that TiE’s event-related income of Rs. 20.60 lakh was within the 20% threshold of total receipts of Rs. 1.53 crore. Membership fees, which the AO wrongly treated as commercial receipts, were held to be part of GPU activities and not commercial in nature. Profit generation, even if present, does not disqualify an entity from exemption when the dominant purpose remains charitable.
The Tribunal held that the company met the statutory tests for charitable status under GPU and satisfied the 20% threshold for incidental commercial receipts; the ITAT directed the AO to grant full exemption under Section 11.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 648-Day Delay After Assessee Lost Family During COVID, Restores AppealPremium
- ITAT Quashes Rs 2 Crore Penalty as Time-Barred; Limitation Starts from AO’s Reference, Not Show-Cause NoticePremium
- ITAT Remands Appeal After Finding NFAC Ignored 89 Pages of Evidence on Cash Deposits and Flat Improvement CostPremium
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity in Rs 2.63 Crore Foreign Bank Credit Addition CasePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition on Explained Demonetisation Cash DepositsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








