Bombay Burmah Moves Supreme Court To Remove Lease Rent Observations In Singampatti Tea Estate Case:

Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited has approached the Supreme Court seeking removal of observations on alleged lease rent dues in the Singampatti tea estate matter.
Bombay Burmah Files Plea Before Supreme Court

The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd. has informed the stock exchanges that it has filed an interlocutory application before the Supreme Court seeking removal of certain observations related to lease rent in the Singampatti tea estate matter in Tamil Nadu.
The company said it had taken a 99-year lease of the Singampatti estate in 1929. In December 2023, it decided to stop plantation operations after finding the lease commercially unviable. Operations ended on June 16, 2024, and a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) was introduced for 534 workers. According to the company, all VRS dues have either been paid directly to the workers or deposited with the Assistant Commissioner of Labour for disbursement.
The closure of operations was challenged before the Madras High Court by some workers, but the High Court dismissed their petitions in December 2024. One of the workers later appealed before the Supreme Court.
The company stated that it handed over more than 8,152 acres of leased land to the Tamil Nadu Forest Department in May 2025. After removing machinery and demolishing factory buildings, it also handed over the remaining 221.44 acres on July 11, 2026.
In its order dated May 29, 2026, the Supreme Court noted the progress made in restoring the land and settling VRS payments. However, based on a report of the Central Empowered Committee (CEC), the order also mentioned that certain lease rentals remained recoverable by the State Government.
Bombay Burmah has argued that no official demand or notice for such lease rent has been issued to it and that the observations were based on an internal calculation prepared by a department that, according to the company, lacked jurisdiction. It has, therefore, requested the Supreme Court to recall and expunge those observations and said it will continue updating the stock exchanges on any significant developments.
The company has made the aforementioned disclosure vide an Intimation dated July 21, 2026, addressed to the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE) and Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (BSE), under Regulation 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2612My Recent Articles
- ROC Penalises Nidhi Company and Five Directors for Failure to Furnish PAN and Email IDs of Allottees in Form PAS-Premium
- SBI Revises Cash Withdrawal Charges on Basic Savings Bank Deposit Accounts; Effective from October 1
- Delhi High Court Allows SC and HC Judges to File or Revise ITR Under New Regime Without Listing Certain AllowancesPremium
- ROC Penalises Company and Directors for Not Mentioning DINs of Directors on AOC-4 Forms Balance SheetsPremium
- Substantial Justice Prevails Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 171-Day Delay in Section 54 Exemption Dispute Due to Ill HealthPremium
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







