Judgement

The Tribunal observed that the note had terms like "approximate" and "projection", and "estimation" mentioned on it, and it did not provide any solid proof showing actual income or sales.

Income Tax Addition Based on Rough Paper Not Valid: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad has upheld the addition of Rs. 1.5 crore as capital gains tax on a land sale, rejecting the assessee’s claims.

ITAT Ahmedabad Upholds Rs. 1.5 Crore Capital Gains Tax on Land Sale, Rejects Assessee's Appeal

The Tribunal also cited various judgements, including the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pr. CIT v. Shapoorji Pallonji and Co. Ltd.[2022] 141 taxmann.com 509/288 Taxman 661, which held that the assessing officer could not make any addition just based on suspicion

Assessing Officer Cannot Make Addition u/s 68 Based Solely on Suspicion: ITAT

The ITAT upheld the tax department’s view that the assessee’s penny stock gains were bogus and confirmed the addition as unexplained income.

ITAT Confirms Rs. 1.88 Crore Addition for Fake Penny Stock Gains; Appeal Dismissed

The ITAT, Ahmedabad, has recently upheld the decision of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) to revise the assessment order in a Foreign exchange loss claim case.

ITAT Upholds PCIT's Revision in Foreign Exchange Loss Claim Case

Court reaffirms that bulk approvals without application of mind breach legislative intent; no substantial question of law arises under Section 260A

Explore Our Blogs

Stay updated with the latest insights, tips, and industry trends from our experts

Income Tax Addition Based on Rough Paper Not Valid: ITAT

ITAT Ahmedabad Upholds Rs. 1.5 Crore Capital Gains Tax on Land Sale, Rejects Assessee's Appeal

Assessing Officer Cannot Make Addition u/s 68 Based Solely on Suspicion: ITAT

ITAT Confirms Rs. 1.88 Crore Addition for Fake Penny Stock Gains; Appeal Dismissed

ITAT Upholds PCIT's Revision in Foreign Exchange Loss Claim Case

Delhi HC: Mechanical Bulk Approvals Under Section 153D Invalid; ITAT Order Upheld