Judgement

As the Income Tax Department had failed to follow the mandatory requirement of the Standard Operating Procedure, the High Court quashed and set aside the assessment order and the demand notice.

Gujarat HC Quashes Faceless Assessment for Denial of Video Hearing; Orders Fresh Order per SOP

Articles

Here's a comprehensive guide to help taxpayers avoid the most common and costly mistakes while filing their Income Tax Return (ITR) for the AY 2025-26.

ITR Due Date Extended: Ten Key Mistakes to Avoid While Filing ITR in 2025

Court strikes down additions under Section 115JA; clarifies “reserve” vs. “provision” distinction

Bombay HC: Provision for Doubtful Debts Not a Reserve Under Section 115JA; Book Profits Cannot Be Increased

The High Court directed the GST Department to process the refund and pay the amount along with interest from the date of the application (12.06.2019) within two months.

GST: Delhi HC Orders Refund with Interest as Deficiency Memo Missing; Allows Delayed Appeal on First Claim

ITAT Mumbai allows 10% variation between purchase price and stamp duty value for AY 2017-18, granting retrospective relief under Section 56(2)(vii)(b).

ITAT Allows 10% Variation in Property Value for AY 2017-18 Under Section 56(2)(vii)(b)

Delhi High Court upholds CESTAT ruling directing refund of excess customs duty to Nokia, accepting CA certificate as valid proof of no unjust enrichment.

Explore Our Blogs

Stay updated with the latest insights, tips, and industry trends from our experts

Gujarat HC Quashes Faceless Assessment for Denial of Video Hearing; Orders Fresh Order per SOP

ITR Due Date Extended: Ten Key Mistakes to Avoid While Filing ITR in 2025

Bombay HC: Provision for Doubtful Debts Not a Reserve Under Section 115JA; Book Profits Cannot Be Increased

GST: Delhi HC Orders Refund with Interest as Deficiency Memo Missing; Allows Delayed Appeal on First Claim

ITAT Allows 10% Variation in Property Value for AY 2017-18 Under Section 56(2)(vii)(b)

Delhi HC Orders Refund of Excess Customs Duty to Nokia; CA Certificate Enough to Prove No Unjust Enrichment