Judgement

The Tribunal noted that the case is related to FY 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15, which is already covered in favour of the assessee by the order of the High Court of Karnataka in Fateh Raj Singhvi v. Union of India 73 taxmann.com 252.

Section 234E Fee Not Applicable for FY 2012-13 to 2014-15: ITAT Cites Karnataka HC Order

Court enhances compensation to Rs.74,43,631, holding that allowances must be included in salary for dependency computation and future prospects at 50% apply to a permanent PSU employee.

SC Enhances Compensation to Rs. 74L in Motor Accident Case; Restores Inclusion of Allowances and 50% Future Prospects

ITAT Delhi did not find any relevant reason to interfere with the findings of CIT(A) and hence rejected the appeal filed by the DCIT/Revenue/Income Tax Department.

ITAT Slams Revenue: Appeal Dismissed After AO’s Unexplained Truck Business Income Addition Found Baseless

Articles

The ICAI has given its recommendations to the government to introduce optional joint taxation for married couples.

ICAI Suggests Optional Joint ITR Filing for Married Couples

News

The Bombay High Court nullified a Rs. 22 crore income tax notice after discovering that tax officials had relied on three fake, AI-generated court rulings without verification.

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 22 Crore Tax Notice Based on Fake AI-Generated Judgments

The tribunal also allowed the assessee to submit extra evidence and CIT(A) to get a remand report from the AO on the extra evidence submitted by the assessee.

Explore Our Blogs

Stay updated with the latest insights, tips, and industry trends from our experts

Section 234E Fee Not Applicable for FY 2012-13 to 2014-15: ITAT Cites Karnataka HC Order

SC Enhances Compensation to Rs. 74L in Motor Accident Case; Restores Inclusion of Allowances and 50% Future Prospects

ITAT Slams Revenue: Appeal Dismissed After AO’s Unexplained Truck Business Income Addition Found Baseless

ICAI Suggests Optional Joint ITR Filing for Married Couples

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 22 Crore Tax Notice Based on Fake AI-Generated Judgments

ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow One More Opportunity for Hearing, Subject to Cost Payment