CBDT Guidelines Clarified: HC Nullifies Extra 5% Compounding Demand:

High Court holds 5% compounding rate inapplicable where first plea was rejected; directs department to adhere to 3% acceptance letter
Delhi HC Quashes 5% Compounding Charge on TDS Default

CBDT Guidelines Clarified: HC Nullifies Extra 5% Compounding Demand
The writ petition was filed to challenge the Income Tax Department’s communication dated 08th February 2019, demanding additional compounding charges at 5% in respect of the delay in deposit of TDS for FY 2009-10. The petitioner, a former director of the company, was prosecuted under Sections 276B and 278B of the Income Tax Act. His first compounding application was rejected on February 16, 2016, due to non-payment. A fresh application filed on 05th June 2017 was accepted vide Letter of Acceptance dated 29th January 2018, and the petitioner deposited Rs. 18,99,388, including tax, interest, and compounding charges at 3%.
The dispute arose when the department later treated the case as a “second application” and sought higher charges at 5% on the ground that the petitioner had answered “No” to a query about prior applications in Column 10 of the form. The petitioner contended that since the earlier application was rejected outright, no offence was compounded, and hence the higher rate could not apply.
Issue Raised: Whether the department could levy 5% compounding charges when the petitioner’s earlier compounding plea had been rejected and no offence was actually compounded.
HC’s Judgment: The Court observed that the CBDT’s 2014 Guidelines provide for a 5% rate only when a prior offence has been compounded by order and complied with. Since the petitioner’s earlier application was rejected, it could not be treated as a prior compounding. Referring to its earlier decision in Maspar Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. CCIT (TDS), the Court held that the applicable rate was 3%, not 5%. Therefore, the impugned communication dated 08th February 2019 was quashed.
The Court directed the respondents to proceed strictly in terms of the Letter of Acceptance dated 29th January 2018 at the 3% rate. The writ petition was disposed of, and pending applications were dismissed as infructuous.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








