Delay Condoned as HC Finds Valid Grounds and Lack of Proper GST Notice

HC condones 39‑day delay in GST appeal; directs deposit of additional 10% disputed tax and orders appeal to be heard on merits

HC Allows 39-Day GST Appeal Delay Citing Portal-Only Notice and Consultant’s Illness

Meetu Kumari | Jul 31, 2025 |

Delay Condoned as HC Finds Valid Grounds and Lack of Proper GST Notice

Delay Condoned as HC Finds Valid Grounds and Lack of Proper GST Notice

The assessee challenged the rejection of his GST appeal by the Deputy Commissioner (CT). The petitioner was not made aware of a show-cause notice that was only posted on the GST portal and not served in hard copy. As a result, the assessment order requesting tax, penalty, and interest for AY 2018–19 was also posted on the portal. Only after receiving an intimation notice did the petitioner learn of the order.

He then filed an appeal before the third respondent after a 39-day delay, stating that his GST consultant’s poor health had further delayed the filing of appeal and that he was not aware of the order because a physical copy had not been served. Due to time-barred grounds, the appeal was denied. The petitioner approached the High Court, offering to deposit an additional 10% of the disputed tax apart from the statutory 10% already deposited.

Central Issue: Is it possible to excuse the petitioner’s 39-day delay in filing the GST appeal due to the portal-only notice service and the consultant’s poor health in order to allow for a merit-based decision?

HC Held: The Court permitted the writ petition, overturning the order of rejection issued by the Deputy Commissioner and allowing the 39-day delay. Since the assessment order was only posted on the GST portal and was never served in person, the court determined that the petitioner had provided valid justifications for the delay. The Court determined that the explanation was genuine due to the petitioner’s consultant’s poor health and their voluntary commitment to deposit an extra 10% of the contested tax.

The Court ordered the Deputy Commissioner (CT) to take the appeal on file and decide it on its merits in line with the law after giving the petitioner a fair hearing and receiving the additional 10%. Following these instructions, the writ petition was dismissed, and related miscellaneous petitions were disposed of.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ITAT Ahmedabad deletes major TP additions, limits R&D deduction to DSIR approval PCIT’s Section 263 revision quashed where AO had made due enquiries on alleged bogus purchases Delhi HC awards 6% interest on VAT refund delayed by over 15 years Delhi HC sets aside GST order passed without proper service of show cause notice CBI Court Sentences Three to 3 Years’ Jail in Rs. 1.18 Crore Excise Duty Rebate FraudView All Posts