High Court Quashes GST Cancellation for Vague SCN; Allows Fresh Proceedings with ITC Freeze:

High Court quashes GST registration cancellation for breach of natural justice; directs issue of fresh SCN with ITC usage freeze for 3 months.
Court finds SCN lacked material particulars; sets aside cancellation orders but permits fresh show cause with personal hearing and ITC restriction.

High Court Quashes GST Cancellation for Vague SCN; Allows Fresh Proceedings with ITC Freeze
The assessee LLP challenged the Order-in-Original and the Order-in-Appeal, both relating to the cancellation of its GST registration. The petitioner argued that the original show cause notice dated 15/01/2022 was vague, merely parroting statutory language without disclosing specific allegations of fraud, suppression, or willful misstatement. Additionally, it relied on a letter from the Deputy Commissioner dated January 13, 2022, which the petitioner was not given or referred to.
The petitioner argued that there was an apparent breach of natural justice since it was not given a meaningful chance to reply. Furthermore, it was argued that these fundamental procedural flaws had gone unaddressed by the appellate authority.
Issue Raised: Whether it violates natural justice principles and calls for intervention under writ jurisdiction to cancel a GST registration based on a vague show-cause notice that omits important facts or documents.
HC's Order: The High Court quashed both the impugned orders, holding that the original show cause notice (SCN) was deficient in material particulars and violated principles of natural justice. The Court did, however, permit the authorities to start new proceedings and ordered that a new SCN and all supporting documentation be released in four weeks. Following receipt of the SCN, the petitioner had four weeks to submit a reply. The authorities then had four weeks to hold a personal hearing and issue a reasoned order. The petitioner voluntarily agreed to refrain from using the accrued ITC for three months following the order's date, which the court noted as legally binding.
To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








