ED Files PMLA Complaint Against Chartered Accountant in Rs 6.85 Crore ERDC Fraud Case:

A CA allegedly forged trustee signatures to siphon Rs 6.85 crore from ERDC, prompting the ED to file a PMLA prosecution complaint and attach equivalent assets.
CA Dishonestly Used Trustee's Signature to Issue Unauthorised Bearer Cheques

ED Files PMLA Complaint Against Chartered Accountant in Rs 6.85 Crore ERDC Fraud Case
The ED (Enforcement Directorate), Ahmedabad, has filed a Prosecution Complaint (PC) before the Hon’ble Special Court (PMLA), Ahmedabad, under PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act), 2002. The complaint was filed on March 16, 2026, against a Chartered Accountant (CA) named Tehmul Sethna, who was accused of having defrauded a Trust named "Environment Research and Development Centre (ERDC)".
Consequent to the FIR registered by the Gujarat Police under the IPC (Indian Penal Code) 1860, the ED started its investigation into the matter. During scrutiny, the ED found that Tehmul Sethna was given responsibility to manage the Trust’s (ERDC) administrative and financial work. During this role, he dishonestly took the signature of one of the trustees for opening a bank account, and thereafter, he forged that trustee’s signature to issue unauthorised bearer cheques.
Following this process, he was able to withdraw approximately Rs 6.85 Crore from the Trust's bank account without the Trust knowing or the permission of the other trustees. As per the law, this money cannot be considered legal and is liable to be considered “proceeds of crime", as it was produced using an illegal process.
In this case, the authorities had previously issued a Provisional Attachment Order, under which several immovable properties, such as residential flats and plots worth the same amount as the Proceeds of Crime, i.e., Rs 6.85 crore, were attached.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








